While this sounds ridiculous, far-fetched, and completely made up--I mean, how does ANYONE know what KC or the Cubs will do on September 29th unless they are the GM--I'll play along with the original poster for a second. Dempster sucks. We don't need him, we don't want him, it was yet ANOTHER ill-advised bad contract on Jim Hendry's part. The Royals are slowly improving. They will get there via young players. Baird tried to buy some time with middling, veteran, over the hill free agents in the $5MM/year range--hmm, sounds a lot like Jim Hendry's methods. The new GM would really like to clear out that deadwood salary. He'd give his left arm to be rid of Mike Sweeney and his huge money. I could see the Cubs moving Dempster to a team like KC, only IF KC could realize significant budget relief as part of the deal. How are you going to do that with Dempster owed $10.5MM for 07 and 08? If you're the Cubs, you'd have to take Sweeney to make it happen. Since we have no use for a decrepit DH, you'd have to ask yourself whether you think it will be easier to move Sweeney in a follow-on trade, or Dempster to a different team. Sweeney makes $11MM in 07, so the money is the same as for Dempster, but over one season instead of two. Myself, I'd try to move Sweeney to someone like Detroit, Anaheim, Toronto or Baltimore, four teams that might be interested in a DH, but they won't take him at $11MM. You'd have to eat at LEAST half his money, and now we're back to square one--who's easier to move, Dempster if you eat $5MM of his money, or Sweeney if you eat $5MM of his? (Answer--Dempster). So, I put no stock in this "rumor." Zero.