Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Aaron_Kennelly

Verified Member
  • Posts

    11,482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Aaron_Kennelly

  1. Unfortunately for Lackey our country has decided to ban statues immortalizing horses.
  2. Smart move. You never know how things will shake out. If he makes one play in the outfield to save runs against the Brewers or Cardinals, or steals one base in a big spot, it could help us win the division. Most likely ends up as a nothing move, but you never know. Also could be an insurance policy in case of an injury in the outfield. I can't see any way he makes it onto the playoff roster right now. But, if someone goes down, he could fill Almora's role of last year of only playing defense and pinch running for our Large Adult Son. Right now Almora is going to fill that role as well as being a lefty masher. But if someone gets hurt, you could shuffle roles around and find value in him being on the roster.
  3. This sucks. Hopefully he can get healthy by October.
  4. Well, crap. This makes me sad. Oh well at least #wearegood
  5. There was a time not long ago when Jake Arrieta was the undisputed ace of the Cubs' pitching staff. In 2015, he won 22 games, posted a 1.77 ERA, won the Cy Young award, pitched a no-hitter, shut out the Pirates in the Wild Card Game, and set a major league record for the lowest second-half ERA in history at 0.75. Then 2016 happened. 2016 started out much like 2015 ended for Arrieta. He threw another no-hitter and had a 1.74 ERA until his June 27 start. From then on, he was a broken pitcher. From June 27 on last year, Arrieta had a 4.44 ERA. There were flashes of dominance, but he started giving up homers like a mere mortal and his control issues were interminable. Meanwhile, Kyle Hendricks and Jon Lester cruised to sub-2 second-half ERAs on their way to finishing first and second in the majors in ERA for the year. Arrieta took a backseat as Hendricks and Lester played starring roles in the Cubs' march through the playoffs. Arrieta entered 2017 with a couple fewer mph on his pitches and, while his walk issues dissipated, he was giving up more homers than he ever had as a Cub. Batters were also finding holes a lot more against him; while his BABIP was still very low last year at .241, it was .318 entering July this year. Sitting on a 4.67 ERA entering July, Arrieta was bad for different reasons than he was in the second-half of last year. But bad is bad. And Jake had spent a full year not being very good. The velocity loss was unnerving. Oftentimes a loss of velocity is a harbinger of doom for a pitcher. It can be a precursor to an arm injury. And it definitely can lead to worse results. Even worse for Arrieta, he was losing more velocity during games than any qualified starter in the league. As I pointed out on twitter, during his June 27 start, Arrieta's average sinker velocity was 3 mph slower in the 5th inning than in the 1st inning. That was worse than his in-game velocity loss had been all year -- around 2 mph on average at that point. This appeared to be a major problem to me. While most starters' in-game velocity loss gets smaller as they build up stamina later in the year, Arrieta's in-game velocity loss was growing. Combine that with his struggles and his overall loss in velocity, and I was very worried. I wondered if an arm injury was just around the corner. At best, I earnestly doubted that we'd see much positive in his performance the rest of the year. Since then, Arrieta is only losing around 1.3 mph on average between the 1st and 6th innings. That's equal to his in-game velocity loss last year. His average sinker velocity loss between the 1st and 6th innings has only been over 2 mph once in his last 11 starts -- in a start back in July. Oh yeah, since that June 27 start, Arrieta also has a 1.69 ERA. My worries were completely unfounded. Arrieta has spent the last two months reclaiming his throne as the ace of the Cubs' staff. But how? On the whole, his velocity hasn't gone back up. He's still averaging around 92.5 mph with his sinker, as he's been doing all year. He's not getting more movement on his stuff. His walk rate has dropped a little, from 8.1% pre-July to 7.6% since. However, that's come with his strikeout rate dropping from 24.2% to 21.8%. His average exit velocity is down, but only barely, from 87.1 mph to 86.6 mph. Still, the results have been night and day. I've been stumped on how Night Man turned into Day Man. The obvious answer is that his command has improved. That's what the eye test tells me. It just seems like he isn't missing locations as often. I've spent hours trying to confirm it, but to no avail. In my last two articles, I was able to demonstrate Jon Lester's pinpoint command with his cutter and Kyle Hendricks' mastery of painting the edges of the strike zone. Take this heatmap from the Lester article: http://i.imgur.com/6sVvix1.png You can tell exactly what Lester's trying to do just by looking at that. Meanwhile, here is the heatmap for Arrieta's sinker this year: http://i.imgur.com/gz0oJ3P.png Well, we can't tell too much from that. The hot spot is right in the middle of the zone and stretches out across the whole zone. That's how it was when he won a Cy Young in 2015, too. There are minor differences between his pre-July heatmap and his heatmap since then. But it's the same pattern: sinkers all over the zone. In my article on Hendricks, I established that Hendricks was able to avoid the heart of the plate and work the edges like few other pitchers. We can't see it in the heatmaps, but it would be plausible that Jake was just leaving too many pitches over the heart of the plate earlier in the year. And maybe he's been able to work the edges better lately. We'll work with this strike zone: In 2015, Jake threw 7.8% of his pitches in the blue square in the middle of the zone. Before July this year, Jake threw 6.4% of his pitches in that square. Since then, he's thrown 8.1% of his pitches there. That is... not what I was expecting. He was avoiding the middle of the zone earlier this year more than when he's been successful. Surely, he's placing his pitches more on the edges now, though. Right? Nope. In 2015, he threw 38.7% of his pitches in the boxes with the green lines (which represent the edge of the strike zone) going through them. Before July this year, that number was 38.7%. Since then, it's at 35.3%. Again, the exact opposite of what I'd hoped to find. Intuitively, it doesn't make sense. How did he get better once he started throwing more pitches right down the pipe, if his stuff didn't get any better? Well, we have to think about Jake differently. He's not like other pitchers. For one, his stuff is nasty. His pitches have a lot of movement. And he throws the ball differently than other pitchers. He pitches across his body, which makes his pitches come in from different angles. His pitches are harder for the batter to pick up. The reason Jake is good is because batters have no idea what his stuff is doing or where it's going. His pitch might be heading for the middle of the plate, but that doesn't do the batter much good if he can't tell that. When Hector Rondon throws a 98-mph fastball that is straight as an arrow right down the pipe, it's easier for the batter to pick up and jump all over. I think Jake would rather not throw his sinker right down the pipe. But it's not such a big deal if he does. Of the 132 pitchers that have thrown at least 1,500 pitches this season, Arrieta's thrown the 66th-fewest % of his pitches right down the middle. (You'll notice Hendricks and Lester are 3rd and 15th). It doesn't matter because hitters only slug .323 against Arrieta on those pitches, which is second-lowest behind Max Scherzer. He doesn't paint the edges like Hendricks, either. While Kyle leads the league in % of pitches thrown on the edges, Arrieta ranks 113th. There are a few reasons for this. Jake is trying to beat you with stuff. He isn't trying to paint. If you can't hit it when it's right down the pipe, then why bother nibbling? Also, since his stuff has such wicked movement, it's going to be more difficult to have pinpoint accuracy with it. Regardless, we've gotten nowhere. There is seemingly no way to tell if Jake's command has improved because he throws his sinker all over the zone and he doesn't care if it goes right over the heart of the plate. I've been all over Fangraphs, Baseball Savant, and Brooks Baseball looking for answers elsewhere. I've pored over zone profiles and heatmaps and game logs. I've split it up against left-handed batters before and after the start of July. I've split it up against right-handed batters before and after. I've looked at changeups before and after. I've looked at sliders and curveballs and four-seam fastballs. I've had dozens of tabs open on my computer. I have pages of notes written and scratched out. And what have I found? There is no discernable difference in how Jake is pitching. Then I had an epiphany. I wondered how Jake was getting hit so hard earlier in the year, if he was throwing the same pitches. Was he just unlucky? So I searched his pitch chart for all pitches that were hit for extra-bases before July: http://i.imgur.com/yYmKf32.png Look at all those sinkers on the inner third by the right-handed batter's box. It shouldn't be that big of a surprise. League wide, right-handed batters slug .372 on sinkers and two-seam fastballs from right-handed pitchers on the outer third. They slug .492 on sinkers and two-seam fastballs from right-handed pitchers on the inner third. This makes sense, as those pitches on the inner third start off over the plate and break into the right-handed batter's bat. The ones on the outside start off the plate and stay away from the batter's power. Here is the pitch chart of all extra-base hits against Arrieta since July (Note: his two-seam fastball and his sinker are the same pitch. It's just classified differently for a few games.) http://i.imgur.com/dgn0ojf.png The distribution is the same across the plate, like we'd expect. However, there simply aren't as many sinkers being hit for extra-bases. This influenced me to search for all sinkers to right-handed batters on the inner third that were put in play before and after the start of July. You can see in the count breakdown of these balls in play that a lot of them came when the count was 1-0, 2-0, 3-0, and 3-1 before July. Since then, the balls in play are often coming when Arrieta is tied or ahead in the count. No sinker on the inner third to a right-handed batter has been put into play on a 2-0, 3-0, or 3-1 count since the start of July. Moreover, since the start of July only 39% of his sinkers on the inner third are being put in play, compared to 46% before July. OK, now we're finally getting somewhere. Let's search for all of the sinkers Arrieta has thrown when behind in the count to a right-handed batter, located anywhere. Here is his heatmap in such situations before July: http://i.imgur.com/2JvOfe6.png Here is his heatmap in such situations since the start of July: http://i.imgur.com/GEny9RP.png And here is his heatmap in such situations in 2015: http://i.imgur.com/9nvyHkY.png That's it! Before July came around, when Jake got behind in the count, he left his sinker on the inner third. Now, he's staying away from there, like he did in 2015. He's obviously trying to get a strike in those situations. Early in the year he was either choosing to throw them right in a guy's wheelhouse or he was missing his spots. If I had to speculate, I'd say he knew he didn't have his command and was just trying to get it over the plate, and the sinker movement led the pitch to the inner third. Now that he's regained his command, he feels more comfortable starting it off the plate and bringing it backdoor for a strike. When Jake does that, it's an impossibly difficult pitch to hit. http://www.pitchesandswings.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Jake-Arrieta-Sinker-Behind.gif As we saw when we first started digging into Arrieta's command issues, he'll still throw his sinker all over the plate. Additionally, batters struggle to do much with the ones he leaves over the middle of the plate. The problem with leaving the sinker on the inner half on a 2-0 count, though, is that the batter is sitting on that pitch. Jake has a lot of different pitches with a lot of different, nasty movement. It's a tough pitch to react to if you aren't expecting it. If you are expecting it, and you get it right in your wheelhouse, the pitch loses its edge. This is definitely where some of the dissonance is coming from in his numbers and his zone profile. He's throwing the same pitches with the same movement, but it's more about how he is distributing them. He's better able to keep hitters off-balance now. And he is able to execute pitches when he needs to do so. He's pitching with conviction. Before July, it appears that when he need to make a pitch, he had no hope but to try to throw it down the middle. With his command back, he has confidence in his pitches. You can tell by how much he is using his sinker. Before July, he was throwing his sinker 55.5% of the time. Since then, he's thrown it 68.1% of the time. We can see evidence in his confidence in the sinker more clearly when we look at how often he's thrown it when he gets behind in the count -- especially when he's facing a right-handed batter and can drop it in backdoor for a strike. Before July, he was throwing his sinker 58.9% of the time to right-handed batters when he was tied or ahead in the count. He bumped his usage up -- like most pitchers do -- to 62.7% when he got behind in the count. Since July, he's thrown the sinker 61.9% of the time when he's tied or ahead in the count against right-handed batters. And when he gets behind, he's throwing it an astounding 83.2% of the time. Nearly all of the increase in sinker usage comes from when he gets behind in the count. The numbers are similar against left-handed batters, though not quite as drastic. Jake's been better against lefties since July, too. But they are only slugging .052 lower overall. Righties, on the other hand, were slugging .402 against him before July and are only slugging .198 since. His sinker command is largely responsible. While righties were slugging .400 against his sinker before July, they are only slugging .165 against it since. According to Pitch Info Pitch Values, Arrieta had the league's most valuable sinker in 2015. He had the most valuable sinker again in 2016. This year, his sinker has been the 2nd-most valuable. Before July, it was barely an average pitch. Since then, it's been lethal. His command explains it all, too. Before July, righties were pulling his sinker for a lot of long flys and line drives. That's something they didn't do in 2015. They've stopped pulling the ball in the air since July. Also, his sinker was inducing ground balls 50.6% of the time against righties before July, and it's induced ground balls 59.7% of the time since. You can really notice the difference when you see the spray heatmap for his sinker against righties from before July: http://i.imgur.com/saWjDNN.png Compare that to his spray heatmap since then: http://i.imgur.com/flaWZFk.png Again, his changes against left-handed hitters haven't been quite as severe. But, if you look at his spray heatmap for his sinker against lefties since July, you'll notice it's a lot closer to what it looked like in 2015 rather than pre-July. There are some other slight differences in Arrieta before and after July, too. But I think we can attribute most of Arrieta's success to his reclaimed sinker command. It should be mentioned that some of these differences are assuredly due to luck. If we compare Arrieta's wOBA and xwOBA before and after the start of July, it looks like his luck shifted right around the same time his command shifted. Arrieta's wOBA was .335 and his xwOBA was .308 before July 1. Since then, his wOBA is .254 and his xwOBA is .273. So, he's definitely pitching much better, as evidenced by the dramatically lower xwOBA. But he's also had Lady Luck on his side. I wrote a lot earlier in the year about how unlucky Jake had been with his BABIP and HR rate, which were both unsustainably high. Now, things have evened out. It's really been two diametrically opposed halves. Bad and unlucky turned into good and lucky. It won't matter how lucky he is, if he keeps pitching like this, though. When Jake has this kind of command, he's one of the best pitchers in baseball. And this year might be his turn to shine in the playoffs. Someone else will have to do the Charlie Work.
  6. I think Kyle is my favorite Cub ever. Possibly my favorite person ever. I can't help but laugh watching him walk off the mound.
  7. That is a ludacris misspelling. Jeez. Do they not have editors? They were skiddish of hiring any that might cut the racism out of their articles.
  8. [tweet] [/tweet] [tweet] [/tweet]
  9. Yeah, xFIP is a pretty bad stat. And it is even worse in this era, when the ball is flying out of the park, since the ability to suppress home runs is even more important. Just because a stat is better than ERA, on the whole, doesn't mean it's actually a good stat. And we have a ton of data showing that certain pitchers are able to limit exit velocity, and that limiting exit velocity limits home runs. So for Dave Cameron to randomly throw that and only that out when he horsefeathering writes at Fangraphs is pretty dumb. How did he actually do with xwoba this month? Interesting to note that by strictly batted ball data for this season he induced his lowest amount of soft contact this month, but line drives (nebulous stat) were way down, and he did not allow hitters to pull him much. I was surprised to see his GB% hasn't increased much in the 2nd half. Before July, xwOBA of .308. Actual wOBA of .335. Since July, xwOBA of .273. Actual wOBA of .254. There was definitely some bad luck early on and some good luck lately. But, he's also done a lot better job of managing contact. Just a tale of two diametrically opposed halves all around.
  10. I too typically really look at the BB/K numbers when looking at box scores and generally agree with this. A few things though, Nova has the 2nd lowest BB/9 in the league. He hasn't walked more than 3 guys in a start all year and he's had more 0 walk games (9) than 2+ walk games (8). It could have all been part of the plan of attack to swing early and often tonight. Also once we put up that 7 spot in the 5th it seemed like guys were mostly going up and swinging at the first thing close to get the game over with (and also I'm sure it's some violation of an unwritten rule to be looking for walks up 10+ in games). Good point. I forgot Nova started. And that's probably a pretty good strategy against him.
  11. I looked this up, for every game we scored 8+, and 10+ and all the mega-outbursts, and apparently this was all a figment of my imagination. We've had a few games where we've struck out a lot and scored a bunch of runs. But, generally, we've walked a lot in most of the games we've score a bunch of runs. We are striking out more and walking less overall in the 2nd half. It's not a huge difference. But maybe the other games that haven't been as good are seeping into my mind.
  12. I might be just making up horsefeathers, but I feel like every time we've had a huge offensive outburst in the 2nd half, our BB/K ratio has been absolute horsefeathers. 1 BB and 9 K tonight. That's like the one thing I always look for in a box score -- just because I feel like it's the one thing that's most important to consistently being successful on offense. Control the strike zone and eventually you're going to score some runs, even if you had a rough day with the bats in any particular game. Not that I'm complaining about scoring 17 runs that way. I just think it's funny that we're scoring more runs when we're swinging away instead of by being patient. (Even though there's a good chance this is complete bullcrap.)
  13. I'm not sure what I'd do if we were to add him, as far as the post-season rotation. But I still want this really badly. As TT said, the assets aren't going to change very much. And it's something that would make sense after the season. And our fortunes look a lot better now and it's still doable later. So we've got all that covered. Count me in on doing it now, though. You just never know. Give me the insurance against Lester having a setback or Quintana struggling or whoever else going down. If everything goes well and we have to bump one of them, we'll figure that out then. Plus, whoever goes to the pen -- Quintana? -- could become a multi-inning asset, much like Monty. Just skip over all the rest of the flotsam in the pen and go to the multi-inning guy as the only bridge to Davis. Not the worst outcome.
  14. *Salivating thinking about all the posts I'll bump*
  15. Yeah that's not what I said though. Maybe I'm not reading the situation correctly but isn't xFIP basically saying, wait a minute, his HRs should be higher given all the flyballs he's allowed? I'm basically saying his HR/FB% is getting back into vintage Jake range (7% in 2nd half and 2% in August) so that's not some random fluke or anomaly. His HR suppression was one of his signatures during his peak. Yeah, xFIP is a pretty bad stat. And it is even worse in this era, when the ball is flying out of the park, since the ability to suppress home runs is even more important. Just because a stat is better than ERA, on the whole, doesn't mean it's actually a good stat. And we have a ton of data showing that certain pitchers are able to limit exit velocity, and that limiting exit velocity limits home runs. So for Dave Cameron to randomly throw that and only that out when he horsefeathering writes at Fangraphs is pretty dumb.
  16. i don't think us or the nats are going to catch them in the standings unfortunately I assume he meant after we sweep the Nats. This is correct. After we sweep the Nats and before we sweep the Indians.
×
×
  • Create New...