He doesn't seem to be much of a patient guy. And he doesn't have a strong track record of performance. He was also rated much, much, much lower than where he was selected. Wouldn't you expect a football fan to question his team if they drafted a guy in the first round who everybody else had listed as a 3rd or 4th rounder? I don't think he's worth getting excited about. Maybe in a few years he'll be a halfway decent baseball player, but that's not exactly exciting. I'm reserving judgement at this time. Wilken's record in Toronto was stellar...16 of his 17 first round picks either are or were quality every day players in the majors. I'm real interested to see the direction our system moves in over the next couple of years. Just because you're not projected high doesn't mean squat in baseball. Look where Pujols was drafted... I'm not passing final judgement either. I was responding to another in a long line of criticism of fans for criticizing the Cubs. The guy could be a decent major leaguer some day. The odds of him being great are extremely small, and there's no one thing about him to really create a bunch of excitement. On what evidence do you base this statement? Isn't a little early to tell what the odds are? Wilken's track record, as previously mentioned, is long and good. And since when is a BA ranking the be all end all. Maybe its all the evidence that we are privy to, but I'm betting Wilken may have had a bit more scouting information than what he could learn at brewerfan.com or whatever it is. He picked Alex Rios 19th overall and he wasn't on BA's radar either. He's turning out okay, isn't he? I don't think that Wilken would take a guy 13th if he didn't feel that his odds of becoming great weren't better than "extremely small". So, the question is, what do you know that he doesn't?