Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Careless

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Careless

  1. I suppose I could ask you the same question, but I will try not to insult your intelligence. Be that as it may, you are absolutely unequivally and tottally incorrect. Part of the scientific method includes the practice of objective observation and measurement. For example, some scientist a long, long time ago in a country far, far away discovered that water boils at 100 degrees C or 210 degrees F at sea level. Get a thermometer and try it yourself. If you go to a higher altitude it will even boil at a lower temp. I guess one could say that science has disproved that water boils at any other temp besides 100, but then again that is an ass backwards way to look at things, isn't it? Science is fun ---------------- Post script> Maybe prove is the wrong word. From now on let's use the word demonstrate. Again, if a physcial thing cannot (as in impossible to) be measured in some way, shape, or form it a metaphysical sertitude that it does not exist. He's completely correct, nothing is ever proven by science. Only math and logic have proofs. Science by definition never proves, only suggests (and disproves)
  2. Only 2 years of service? he pitched 22 games in 2003
  3. Has he learned nothing from last off season? Chemistry is such overrated garbage. Tell the 05 White Sox, 04 Red Sox, 03 Marlins, 02 Angels and the 96-2000 Yankees that. why? do you know for a fact that they had great 'chemistry'? The empirical evidence suggests they got along well, which helped their performance as a team. um...sure. and this year's cub team supposedly got along great (or so empirical evidence suggests), and they sucked big time. They didn't have the talent to compliment the camaraderie. great self-sealing argument. (pst, ask him if he knows what "empirical" actually means) yes. i have an mpa. Then you shouldn't be using "empirical" as its own antonym. Shame on you.
  4. Has he learned nothing from last off season? Chemistry is such overrated garbage. Tell the 05 White Sox, 04 Red Sox, 03 Marlins, 02 Angels and the 96-2000 Yankees that. why? do you know for a fact that they had great 'chemistry'? The empirical evidence suggests they got along well, which helped their performance as a team. um...sure. and this year's cub team supposedly got along great (or so empirical evidence suggests), and they sucked big time. They didn't have the talent to compliment the camaraderie. great self-sealing argument. (pst, ask him if he knows what "empirical" actually means)
  5. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2211753 By the way, note that Lawton did not appeal his suspension. According to Will Carroll / USA Today Sports Weekly, the A.L. playoff offender was in fact appealing his suspension. If Will Carroll and USA Today Sports Weekly are correct, there is another suspect that is still at large. You left out the "And I'd do it again in a second if I knew I wasn't going to get caught"
  6. Fewer Win Shares than Eckstein and Furcal and we're going to use pretty damn good?? Don't tell ESPN that Jeter is statistically worse than Eckstein... If he didnt come with the Yankee pricetag (20 mil, ouch), tell me you wouldnt want him on your team. Doesn't mean he's not massively overrated. he was the third best shortstop in the AL for quite some time while people were saying he's one of the best players ever (and was getting paid as what, 3rd most?) But I suspect I think he has been much more highly rated than you do.
  7. AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS Marquis 87 10 27 8 1 1 40 10 2 11 0.310 0.326 0.460 0.786 Zambrano 80 8 24 6 2 1 37 6 1 23 0.300 0.309 0.463 0.771 Wow, marquis must have had a horrid sept. His ops was at nearly 900 earlier.
  8. Probably because marquis outhit barrett
  9. Wasn't that the one where after he tackled him and while he was lying on top of him, he looked at the ref and held his arms out in the "I didn't do anything" gesture?
  10. The lions have a virtually identical schedule. apparently this was the bears first win in a dome since 02.
  11. jones today: 72 yards, 3.3 ypc. touchdowns: bears defense 1.5, jones 0
  12. WOW faaantastic
  13. what a debaclicious punt return
  14. unbelievable trying to lose
  15. Bears are actively trying to lose now, apparently
  16. garcia has really been pummeled today
  17. game
  18. why not just set your timeouts on fire
  19. NO!!!! DON'T CHALLENGE IDIOT
  20. what the heck? they didn 't even do a video review
  21. so can they call intentional grounding if they rule it's a forward pass?
  22. :shock: :lol:
  23. *sigh*
  24. and they pick up the face mask flag, meaning that the bears won't score
  25. Did they just say that the bengals have had 5 interception games against 3 of the 4 nfc north teams?
×
×
  • Create New...