That makes no sense. If injuries caused the decline, how can you describe the good year as a fluke? And people who still don't acknowledge the 280+ very solid innings in 2004 and 2005 simply cannot partake in any analysis of Prior. If he's truly done, that doesn't make 2003 a fluke. It simply says 2003 was his best year before injuries (most likely due to severe overuse) damaged his body and ruined his effectiveness. But the guy is 26, not 31. Pitchers battle through all kinds of problems in their 20's quite frequently. The very best HOF types get through this timeframe unscathed, but there are still good pitchers who had up and down results before their late 20's. Predestination I want to see them actually put holiday express customers, selected completely at random, against baseball "experts" picking games or stat-winners, something like that. Since the pros are so lousy, they'd come off as being roughly equal to the experts even if they lost. Time for an ad pitch