Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. In between 2 month stints on the DL, sure, maybe. But the fact that we may as well play with 2 OF and a broom with a glove on it propped up in LF when he's out there sort of matters. well so does the fact that we might as well have the same at the plate when heyward is up. what is this team missing more right now hitting or defense theres a fair chance, better the 75%, you'd have that broom in LF and AB if you start Soler. heres a question, if you really want to get Soler in there, why not sit Addi. Put Javy at ss, Zo and 2b and your infield D doesnt lose alot and you still a) keep RF and CF locked down and b) get (hopefully) a LH pitcher mashing god at the plate?
  2. Probably because Soler did outplay Heyward this year (at the plate), has a crapload of power that is kind of missing from this lineup outside of Bryzzo and Javy, had an .864 OPS since Aug 1st (not including 0-6 in the playoffs so far, too lazy to do the math) and had an OPS against lefties that was 230 points higher than Heywards in 2016. If you want to argue that its not worth benching Heyward against a lefty because of the drop off in defense, that's fine. But saying that he'll probably be just as bad at the plate as Heyward against a lefty is silly. check out their splits against the dodgers and at LA. Heyward has outhit him in both instances. Now, why exactly, idk, and sample size, but it seems to me that playing Heyward might make as much sense for his bat then his D.
  3. Soler was objectively the 5th best hitter on the team this season, despite the overreacting to a 6 PA sample in this year's playoffs. yes, but, hes been pretty lousy against the Dodgers and at Chavez revine. Heyward has been better against both.
  4. I really dont get why anyone thinks Soler is going to out play Heyward. Hit probably be just as bad with the bat and 10 times worse in the field
  5. Yeah. We didn't get to Kershaw, but they tagged Hendricks on a wind aided fluke. That was a tough loss but by no means indicative of how this series will trend I believe.
  6. no hit no hit no hit no hit no hit no hit guys im trying
  7. I'll give the Cubs credit, they are really up against a monster, and yet they are right here in it and getting control
  8. Be super patient the first time through and lull him into throwing some horsefeathers over the plate that we crush? I think it was more Kyle and Willson scouting the ump
  9. those ab's had to be a part of the strategy from Maddon. weird
  10. contreas, if you are going to sit there with a bat on your shoulder, maybe we can get miggy in here
  11. my place. I dont guarantee anything, but it will be sewn to you.
  12. I have no faith in this team's ability to draft and develop a QB. We could get the second coming of Peyton Manning and still screw it up. Yeah, they're clearly mired in mediocrity at best from top to bottom of the entire organization. They're pretty much doomed until something drastic happens to get some smarter people running things. like, Virginia sells the team?
×
×
  • Create New...