Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. Narcissism gone wrong
  2. I like 2017 Jason Heyward batting better then 2016 Jason Heyward even if the power is all the way there. His triple today was a solid spank
  3. I didn't realize we put him on waivers http://espn.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/38293/ego-fergusons-stay-with-packers-short-lived-after-failed-physical
  4. its almost like, someone told them they were old and past their prime, "McConner" - "The Wild" -"The Penguins", they werent the focus anymore and they responded by saying "horsefeathers that" and kicking everyones ass
  5. You mean the last two games, and last game was over by the end of the first period. and in their win streak before the two ugly losses. Score a couple early, put the defense on kill, and if the goalie can keep his head on, this team just picks its spot late. whoever>kane>panarin score. whoever>panarin>kane score.
  6. should i worry that every game we seem to win lately, its with fewer (and like, 10) less shots on goal, or should I be really horsefeathering happy Kane and Panarin and KEISEACAMHJA are on this team???
  7. No Hooker or Adams feels wrong
  8. St. Louis. I want revenge
  9. Spring is always good when the Blackhawks are good
  10. The sight of Cutlers butt saddens gooney Meanwhile, there are real things to be sad about https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fvimeo.com%2F190063150&h=ATNI8j23e7Y9tcLi--AHJXJpX6x0-l2nh-K5rMhANoHpPmTZc-6fVe1-_gMCFSw8kfyAIEpKuDq1Hh4JpFqJJSRfHJm-m2N7EOh7q6x2RAK-_Q&s=1&enc=AZP3QAfL36D5URyCYn3IGNerpvdrFIYEcGP0g4W5qUxaEFtMvieZxzJ6s8ezOINWRD837OzQFq2M7-kYjdAnDuV2
  11. Spectacularly, the sun rose in the east, if not the same as any other day.
  12. Maybe I'm missing something, but, you think it is stupid that a celebrity posting a bare ass photo of her NFL QB husband is "a thing"? In what world would this not be a thing? I think he was talking about the censorship part, not Jays trendy bare ass
  13. Out of the three STF, the Lightning were the ones I feared the most.
  14. ahhhh good ole Cedar Falls. Home of bad floods and strip joints. C'est la vie
  15. horsefeathers, you're talking me into wanting him gone now. I mean, drafting hasn't exactly been a weak point so far. One very good draft and one ehh one before he got his own guys on staff. Which is weird considering his strength was supposed to be FA
  16. I don't understand why this keeps being a point of emphasis for you guys. It makes no sense to me. You don't like the QB class, but you acknowledge the need to take one. But you are advocating taking what would likely be the 3rd or 4th QB off the board w/ a trade down or waiting a round? That makes no sense. If you can't separate the QBs enough to figure out which one is the best, you don't just take whatever one is left when other teams pick their guy. You actually have to figure out which one is the best and take him. That's how you end up with Rex Grossman and Cade McNown. I'm with you. Take your top guy at #3 or wait to see who's left in Rd 2-3. To me, trading down only makes sense if there is an impact player outside of QB you want later in the first, but you could just as easily scratch that itch at #3
  17. Who is Sarah Spaine
  18. Who is Sarah Spaine
  19. I mean, how often does that happen? Does it even happen every year, and how truly successful is it?
  20. Ummm, because if you are picking top 5 you most likely sucked the year before, hence plenty of room for improvement And you can't take advantage of plenty of room for improvement by trading down for more picks? Suuuuure. That's my question. How many teams do?
  21. I guess my point is that's why trading picks seems so unlikely to me. When you are picking top 5, you typically have plenty of needs and therefor it makes more sense to pick your top guy if you can. What makes you say this? Ummm, because if you are picking top 5 you most likely sucked the year before, hence plenty of room for improvement
  22. How many teams weigh 8 players equally enough to trade out of a spot where they could draft their #1, even for more pucks? Didn't mean to imply that the Bears would have all 8 rated the same. Just to paint the picture of what the team would be looking at to draft. I guess my point is that's why trading picks seems so unlikely to me. When you are picking top 5, you typically have plenty of needs and therefor it makes more sense to pick your top guy if you can.
  23. How many teams weigh 8 players equally enough to trade out of a spot where they could draft their #1, even for more pucks?
×
×
  • Create New...