minnesotacubsfan
-
Posts
25,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan
-
Cubs to visit the White House Monday
minnesotacubsfan replied to gobigred's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Needs a cigarette now that he's "finished" -
The "I Don't Hate Dexter Fowler" thread
minnesotacubsfan replied to imb's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Hate the game, not the playa -
Ah ok
-
How do you read that? Is +200 the best chance or the worse chance?
-
You didn't witness the North Stars move to Dallas did you
-
I like Gold Gloves and I cannot lie: the Jason Heyward thread
minnesotacubsfan replied to NOLA's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
yeah, the only reason i granted him even a tiny shred of credibility was that he was followed by ian happ for some reason. Jose Bautista follows me. So does Ervin Santana. You should give Bautista some advice on how to grow a beard. Dude looks like a third grader out there -
I find sports radio a decent way to pass the time while at work or driving as long as they aren't talking about teams I care about. Then their universally terrible arguments and opinions are more amusing than infuriating. I'm straight up with jersey on this, and probably less of a participate then he.
-
Nvm
-
I want the top QB, DL in Rd 2
-
I'm leaning Turbisky. I know he's young, lack of college playing time, etc, but I see more upside longterm with him. I feel like there is more that could go right with him vs Watson, and less that could go wrong. But I don't think you cannot take him if he's there at #3, not with our QB situation I worry about a David Carr situation if we don't protect him however.
-
So?
-
Vince Young NFL is what scares me. Also, Watson may in traction after last night
-
I doubt it could get much worse then it currently is
-
so the only change from 2015 to 2016 was Turbisky? no other drop of talent between those years?
-
They do, but how does Turbisky not have those qualities?
-
When he fucks up, what kind of mistakes does he make?
-
I don't actually think they will either. Personally, I think its a mistake. I think we need better OT's than our current pair, when we actually throw a young QB out there. Hell, I'd make sure to draft an O-Line prospect every year, no matter what though. But my point is that the line is higher-rated in pass protection than Dallas's line, and I doubt you'd have much problem throwing a promising rookie out there behind them. Just finished the film on Trubisky, and wow. We need to take him. Would you take him over Allen? Would you take him if SF takes Allen?
-
This would be easier on Jan 10, but; Trubisky Watson Kizer Mahomes Webb
-
I dont know enough about Taylor to be pos or neg on him. Whats his story? good arm? mobility? does he read the d well? whats his weaknesses?
-
1)Watson would be a huge over-reach at #3 imo 2)who would want to trade up to the third pick? It's an honest question
-
also, are we completely done with Kyle Fuller? next season will effectively be his 3rd in the league. I'm not sure I would count him out
-
boy. Chicago could use a st coach like that.
-
I agree on the QB being the hitch pin to offensive success to a point. I think our line, albeit potentially solid, is thin. I wouldn't mind Allen in Rd 1, but that would be a huge get. How could SF not take him? I'd look at Tabor even. But if Allen and Garrett go 1-2 (not respectively), are you sure you pass on all the available QBs? I'd probably grab Kizer.
-
I keep seeing Trubisky mentioned in the first couple of picks if he goes. You think he's going to fall to the second?? Well yea! We're going to have the 1969 Vikings defense too!!! I should stop posting after 3.
-
I see Swiss cheeze I'm posting from a creamery, however
