You would support that because it's an unreasonable proposition, no offense. It's more or less one of those "If we throw together enough mediocre talents we can get back a real impact player" proposals which never work. Murton and Marshall have far less trade value than most of us think. Not many teams have an opening in left field they can't fill with somebody better than Murton. If he played a different position he'd have value, but he doesn't. Marshall's trade value has been even more understated. He's shown flashes, but he keeps hitting the wall at a certain number of innings, and his upside isn't that great. Who has a need for Marshall and thinks Marshall could survive their park (i.e. not an AL team) and has a spare bat to give away in a position we could use? I agree that Marshall has his limitations, but a lot of teams over value performance at the ML level. Marshall would be viiewed as a fairly low risk inexpensive upgrade at the back of most rotations. I also agree that Marshall, Murton & Atkins probably does not net them Tejada, but upgrade the prospect a bit and they might talk. I think there are potential deals out there centered around Marshall, Murton, and prospects - particularly if the Cubs can take some payroll on for a veteran bat nearing the end of his contract (e.g., Tejada, Griffey, Dunn, Burrell, etc.)