If by "fell on his face in his MLB debut" you mean they used him sporadically as a pinch hitter/occasional fill in to give some folks a rest during the last month of the season and never got consistent playing time over his WHOPPING 33 AT-BATS, well then yeah, he fell on his face. You know who else fell on their face in their MLB debut? Jurickson Profar. What kind of [expletive] puts up a .176 batting average over 17AB's AND EXPECTS TO GET AWAY WITH IT WITHOUT ANYONE NOTICING?!?!?! Jurickson Profar? More like Jerkison Sofar, amirite? He had a .432 OPS and struck out once every three times to the plate in his only exposure above AA. The point is not that 40 sporadic PA's make Olt a failure, the point is that he didn't do anything at the MLB level, which is important considering his age, zero AAA plate appearances, and his 25% K rate as a professional(which is higher than Jackson's through AA, since you brought him up). When it's over 33 at-bats, no it's not important. At all. Like AT ALL. Especially when everyone and his mother knew he was rushed to the majors for no reason whatsoever. They brought him up at the beginning of August when there was still one more month of minor league ball left to play, skipping AAA all together, and they had zero place for him to play. For all intents and purposes it appeared to be an opportunity to showcase him for trade, and he didn't succeed, because he wasn't ready. It made zero sense for him to be called up prior to roster expansions, and everyone knew it. Also, Brett Jackson's K% through AA was 27%. Olt's was 29%. That's some nitpicky ish. Also, Brett's AA K% was 28.9%, Olt's was 28.5%. So they had roughly the same K% at AA... except Olt had an OPS .154 points higher than Brett Jackson. And played above average defense at a position of extreme need and shallow depth in the Cubs organization. And really? 33 AB's? Since when does this board try and use that small of a sample size to determine the future worth of a players ability? That's some Cubs.com level lunacy.