Petition to add 21 year old CF Kelvin Encarnacion to the highlighted DSL players. Last year, in 223 AB he was .296/.396/.426 with 1 HR. This season, 43 AB he's .349/.525/.605 with 3 HR, seemingly adding a bit of power to his game. While he is older, could he be this years Candelerio? There's a reason I haven't been including him - he's 20 (not 21) and still in the DSL and in his 3rd year in the DSL. Candelario was 17 and in his first year in the DSL. They're not comparable. But he seems to have made legit strides in each of his first 3 years, so that should be worth something. In 2010, he was a non entitiy at .233/.366/.295, and boosted himself to a respectable .822 OPS the following year. Considering his age, it could be interesting to push him to up a level. Dunston has CF in Boise, and I don't know if they want to cast him all the way to Peoria, although he is age appropriate. Again, I'm aware that it's just 13 games, so I'm talking a bit down the road. Whatever strides he has made are inconsequential when he didn't even make Mesa's roster (he was given the opportunity to stay in the U.S. and got sent back to the Dominican). Encarnacion is repeating the level - the lowest level in the minors - for a 3rd consecutive year and beating up on pitchers 2-4 years younger than him. Just skimming over the 2 DSL rosters, there are several 19-20 year old in their 2nd or 3rd season who havn't improved much at all. There's one such who has 5 HR and a 1.040 OPS in 39 AB, but also has 18 K in those 39 AB. Encarnacion has 8 K and 15 BB in his 43 AB. I just think that it's worth acknowledging the improvements, and wouldn't refer to them as inconsequential. On a similar note, is there a ballpark figure on the percentage of DSL players who even make it to the next level?