Gerut and Hairston have not been 'prospects' of any kind in quite some time. Both are full-time MLB players and have been for a few years. Comparing them to the Cubs names being floated - besides probably Cedeno, who has been around a couple years now - is not really an accurate comparison. I don't know where you get your information, but Gerut hasn't played anything close to full time since 4 years ago, and Hairston has never been a full time player career. He has yet to break 350 ABs in a season. They are both absolutely comparable to Cedeno and Johnson in terms of value. Not that this argument has anything to do with any teams chances of landing Peavey. I meant full time as in they're always with the big club. that means little, especially when that big club has the crap on it's roster that SD has. I guess you guys missed the "distant past" part. If you remember both Hairston(DBacks) and Gerut(Indians) were hyped by their original organizations only to fizzle out in the big leagues. So throwing names out like Vitters, Pie, Castillo is completely comparable in terms of value because at one time both Gerut and Hairston were considered elite prospects and had more value then almost any Cubs farmhand mention as a trade possibility. Getting back to the original post, the Cubs would expect young proven major league talent in return for Z. Not the "Scott Hairston" Type prospect(when he was a prospect)or "Joey Gerut" type prospect(when he was a prospect) or even the "Over hyped Cubs prospect of the month " type prospect which posters have mentioned in terms of a potential Peavy trade. Think about this from a Padres fans point of view. Would you as a Cub fan accept four to five mediocre prospects as the value of Carlos Zambrano if a trade had to be made?