After doing the math...IMO you won't win that argument... from 1988 to 2012 the cubs have outspent the cardinals about $1,584,000,000 to the cards $1,441,000,000 a difference of $143,000,000...which is less than the cubs highest payroll in 2010 ($146Mill) granted...on average we're talking about $66million to the cards $60million for a quarter century that saw massive change in player salary Most the cards have spent was 2012 with $110Mill your dumb cardinal friend is right in the fact that, as player salaries continued to spike to silly levels between the late 80's to present, the cubs went with the program about as much as any team did by nearly doubling payroll between 02' and 03'...we've spent more than the cardinals record $110 in 4 of the past 5 seasons and last year we dropped in payroll for obvious reasons... $6,000,000 gets you a damn good player when you look at the past quarter century trends of player salaries...we've overspent by 1 expensive season($146M difference 1988-2012) I hope you didn't take the bait left by your cards friend...you're smarter than that, aren't you? My argument was that aside from the mid 2000's spending frenzy, the Cubs and Cardinals have always had very similar payrolls.