naw, these are weak excuses. The US attack is poor. I mean it's a pretty factual reality, only 19 of 37 games in the Octagonal featured a team scoring more than 1 goal, with Canada having 5, The US 4, and Mexico 4. The third games in windows have had a 2 goal team in 6 of 8 games while first and second matches are 13 of 29. There is a lot that the US can look inwards about, whether it's about individuals(availability w/ Reyna/Weah/Pulisic, form with the strikers and Pulisic) or structure(tactical choices slowing things down, not choosing Brooks, Adams' lack of passing range at the 6), but we should also be mindful of the environment that suppresses scoring. or is the lack of skill? I mean, these are not good teams. The lack of ideas and organization with the US is concerning - even when they break through, the fall apart in the last third and this isn't because of the refs or bunkering teams. Not playing together is certainly a factor. Why the hell is Zardes out there? He was awful. I also suspect that the left back is not very good (though he did score the only goal). They don't seem to be able to build up the left. Dest, McKennie, Adams, and Weah seem connect really well - is there a style difference from the European players to the MLS players? Certainly Gio would be a big help but you can't count on everyone being available. Once Dest and Adams went out, it looked like McKennie was trying to do it all himself. and what is going on with Pulisic? Out of form? Doesn't like cold? Teammates? I mean, we need more than a set play specialist from him. He got one ball on the left side of the box 1v1 with the right back and didn't even get a shot off - the US needs him to be better.