Yeah-he says that the only player the Cubs got back in the Bellhorn, Patterson, Sosa, and Walker deals is Fontenot. However, what he fails to say is that Bellhorn is out of the league, Patterson is the worst OF in the major leagues this year, Walker is out of the league, and Sosa is only back in the league after taking a year off. Two of those players were run out of town because the city hated them (Sosa and Patterson), and the other two are probably the organization's fault, although Walker being in his walk year and not being great last year probably did more to depress his value than anything the club did. His next paragraph is also confusing. Soriano's defense was never the problem-for right or wrong, the Cubs felt it was his offense that was suffering because of the position change, and have not changed in that decision. Pie was not supposed to be up for good the first time he came up, so I do not know why the writer would say that the Cubs determined he was ready and then decided he wasn't ready. For all the problems in the article, the overall point is true. The Cubs try one thing, and then at the first sign of trouble move on to the next thing. They need to be more patient overall if they plan to have sustained success. The author makes a very good point, he just doesn't use great examples to support it.