Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubColtPacer

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    13,873
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubColtPacer

  1. Complete misuse of assets, a Hendry trademark. Or still have Marquis on the roster, not starting, grumbling about being in the bullpen, and paying him I believe 7 million this year. The original Marquis deal was 3 years 21 million if I remember right. It was a bad situation and Hendry did his best to rectify it, but it's like putting makeup on a pig. Marquis should have never been signed for that kind of money to begin with, but losing Vizcaino is not a big concern, just the cash, which is potentially 4.5 million. Look at the bright side, the Cubs saved 2.5 million off the Marquis contract, although they have nothing to show for it. They actually shaved about 5 million from the contract of Marquis. Marquis did get a 3 year 21 million dollar deal, but the Cubs through backloading had only paid slightly more than 11 through the first two years. 4 went to Vizcaino, a little less than a million went to the Rockies, and the Cubs pocketed 5 million off of it.
  2. It slows the development of his secondary pitches which most everyone agrees need work. I don't believe it signals the end of his career as a starter candidate as a cub. They could easily stretch him out during ST into a starter. It very likely ends his starting chances this year. Maybe they're trying to send a message to Gregg. Though once again the timing is strange. I didn't see the end of last night's game. Who gave up the last 2 runs? Guzman and Gregg were the ones to give up the last two runs, but this roster move was known before yesterday's game started.
  3. The beat writers all seem to think it's Vizcaino. This quote from last night would seem to exclude Patton from the discussion: That seems to rule out Patton unless Lou didn't know what the corresponding roster move was going to be, which seems unlikely.
  4. Anybody know anything about David Williams out of Jacksonville? IU picked him up as their first recruit of 2010. He isn't rated at all of Rivals and is only a two star on scout, but he is also listed at either 6 foot 6 or 6 foot 7, 200 pounds on there and the news release of his commitment has him at 6 foot 8, 220 pounds. Also, his numbers look too good to be a 2 star playing in the Jacksonville area, and he had 5 other schools pursuing him including Kentucky. So I was just wondering if anybody has heard anything about him because all this isn't adding up. The strangest thing about it? The news release has his stats as: 21 PPG, 11 R/G, 6 assists per game. Other places have his stats from this year at 10.9 PPG, 6.7 R/G, 2.7 A/G. And now a Louisville reporter says that his style of play is like Jalen Rose's?
  5. The only way acquiring Gregg worked out was if he had a season good enough to make other teams sign him after we offer him arbitration. That's pretty much shot now... all he had to do was start well and finish well. No GM would remember if this had happened in July. As it stands now, yeah... I'd have been much, much happier to hold onto Ceda. Although now Ceda's injury is nothing to sneeze at either. Shoulder stiffness that has come and gone for the last month does not portend good things for him. I'm not sure when he is expected to make his debut this year or if they even know.
  6. Most people counted Vizcaino's 4 million against Marquis already. The book can now be closed on that contract. 15.5 million for 2 years of Marquis and a couple relief appearances by Vizcaino.
  7. ??? Hendry didn't just say they were getting rid of Cotts in that clip? My sound is really low (putting the baby to sleep) No, he said that Cotts was the only one he would confirm who was safe to stop the speculation that he would be the one released (along with Marshall staying in the rotation).
  8. This definitely sounds like something that Lou asked for considering this news came directly after the Lou-Hendry meeting this afternoon. I'm not sure if Lou thought he was a problem though or if he simply said that he never was going to trust him so might as well let him go.
  9. It's going to be a long night for Daytona. It's already 4-0 in the bottom of the first. I didn't see it mentioned yesterday, but apparently Searle only threw 58 pitches in his 6 innings. I guess they really were pounding that sinker early in counts.
  10. Vizcaino is gone. They still have confidence that Cotts will turn it around but he's on a "short leash". Samardzija will be one of the top four relievers along with Gregg, Marmol, and Heilman. http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/cubs-reds/
  11. McDaniel leaves the game after warming up in the first inning. Sounds like a back problem. Muyco is quickly warming up to replace him.
  12. If they didn't want to release Vizcaino at the end of spring training -- and decided to cut Gaudin instead -- what possibly could justify changing course on that decision at this point? I'm guessing they found a trade partner willing to take a small, small portion of Vizcaino's salary. The only thing I'm questioning is that if it's a trade, why wouldn't it be announced before the ballgame? The Cubs certainly aren't going to be able to use the traded player in tonight's ballgame. I guess it would be all for the benefit of the other team who would be optioning a player to make room. I don't like this move even if it were to replace Cotts. I'd be fine with it if it were any of the other relieving options in AAA replacing Cotts, but Samardzija needed the time down there. And none of the other major league relievers needed to be traded or released yet. My guess is the big reason to make this move is to have one spot in the bullpen that can be optioned up or down, and that they are going to trade a reliever now before the interest dies down.
  13. They even booed Harden when Bruce got the single to drive in the second run. Are you certain they were not shouting "Bruce!"? This sort of confusion pops up at Springsteen shows all the time. And yeah, Glendon Rusch sucked terribly. I don't particularly care that he was "understood" to suck. When you are as awful a pitcher as Rusch is/was, part of your job is absorbing boos. I can sort of understand the booing of Rusch. His first 180 innings were pretty good, and his last 150 innings were absolutely awful for the team. At the same time, he was an excellent guy in interviews, he was really loved on the 2004 team, and he left the team because of a serious illness which usually draws some sympathy. And I would tend to agree that part of the problem is the 2004-2006 years. People had sky high expectations for the team and so anybody who was on the team for only those years is going to be maligned for being part of the problem of why the expectations of the team weren't met, even if they weren't a huge part of the problem.
  14. So now IU will have played UNC twice, Duke twice, Wake twice, Maryland twice, and Georgia Tech once during this challenge. You think they would want to mix it up a little more.
  15. Do they? How many times has he been used as such? I haven't really noticed it happening but perhaps I've missed it. I guess it hasn't happened as much since then, but he was used as such in 3 of the first 4 games. Lou has said they aren't going to remove Fukudome anymore like they did the first week. Gathright was assumed to be a replacement for Bradley in the late innings, but it doesn't look like they are going to do that. And lately they've been letting Reed replace Hoffpauir instead of Gathright. Gathright could possibly have a role on this team, but it would require the Cubs changing some of their decisions about how they want to use other players. If they stay the same way that they have been this past week, he really has no role.
  16. Some quick notables from early action: Vitters 1-1 Flaherty 0-0 BB Carpenter 2 IP 0 H 0 ER 0 BB 4 K and from Tennessee: Thomas 1-2 2 BB
  17. Well, Heilman has been very good, but I really doubt the Cubs will trade him since they really like him. I'm sure other teams would want Gregg, but wouldn't want to pay the price the Cubs would demand, nor would the Cubs be interested in trading him. Cotts probably can't be traded at this point at any price for self explanatory reasons, although if it was later in the season it wouldn't be unbelievably shocking to see another team take him on for cash. Vizcaino has been very good so far. If the Cubs were willing to eat part of his contract, somebody might be interested now that they see that he's pitching a little bit better. The Cubs might be willing to do that as he clearly is not part of their plans in the bullpen this year. That's still very unlikely at this point though. Probably the two most likely to be traded then are Guzman and Patton, who have both struggled with their control in the early going but have shown flashes of what they can do. The Cubs might not want to give them the innings they need (especially since Guzman has clearly lost the 7th inning battle to Heilman), but another team might. The Cubs also have a few arms at AAA that another team might want for their major league bullpen.
  18. Marquez Smith with another home run tonight. Some quick minor league notes from the most recent Cubs.com article: On Colvin (who btw is 2 for 3 so far tonight with a walk and has his average up to .300 at the moment): And on Mateo:
  19. Heck I bet Cuban would give a billion to get the team from Ricketts. He reportedly bid more than that IIRC so he would actually be getting the team for less. Cuban was planning on getting loans for most of the money the same way that Ricketts is. The reason that Cuban pulled out in the first place was that he didn't have enough cash to buy the team and he got worried about being able to refinance the loans he would need to take out.
  20. I was wondering that myself. His fielding deficiencies may be exaggerated at times on here, but I don't see him being all that good in the field. It makes me seriously doubt the defensive metrics all the more. I always thought he was about average defensively for a LF. It's not saying much, cause it's LF, but when compared to his peers, Murton's range and arm weren't so bad. Agreed. I thought Murton was about average in LF and would have been below average in right if he had stayed there (he was a disaster in 2007, but that was partly because he was learning the position). I think they're overrating his range. That's the figure that is putting him so far into the positive. They even had him saving 1.5 runs with his range in just 282 innings in RF in 2007. I really don't think he's a guy who is that much above average range wise in RF to where he is saving a run every 190 innings. His range numbers are even more questionable in LF where his range numbers are very high for a part-time player. The other components seem to be fine..it's just that one component that appears to be throwing things off.
  21. Since there is almost the same people available as last time for the Colts (although Heyward-Bay is intriguing, he would be a departure from other Colts receivers) and the Colts needs certainly haven't changed with free agency, I don't think Exile will be upset if I go ahead and select the same person: Knowshon Moreno, RB, Georgia.
  22. Could he really be worse defensively than Daryl Ward? Bring him up. No, he's not. But the reason that Hoffpauir got stuck in the minor leagues last year for most of the year was because Ward was on the roster. The same will likely be true this year with Fox because Hoffpauir is blocking him.
  23. Probably since it became his real name. Actually, it's been since before it became his real name. Some people would call him that but it wasn't very often (at least on national things, I'm sure in some areas local programs ran with the joke constantly). In the couple of months after he changed his name, there were many radio and TV people that were still saying Chad Johnson and then had to correct themselves on air to say Chad Ochocinco.
  24. Probably since it became his real name.
  25. Tony Thomas with his third home run of the season. The Cubs decided to promote him anyway even with his rather poor season in Daytona last year. It's quite a start so far for him this year. Just as a comparison with the home runs, he had seven total last year. His K/BB ratio is still a problem for him though. He's going to have a hard time if he continues to strike out more than 25 percent of the time and doesn't improve that walk rate to compensate.
×
×
  • Create New...