Well, you can take the obtuse route, but I will clear it up. _ Guys who can't stay healthy DHing are a bad bet to stay healthy playing right field for the Cubs. - .765 vs. whatever you like. The point is, with corner outfielders, you can usually cobble together a .780, a .790, whatever, OPS peformance without having to invest a lot of money. - Nobody who plays for the Chicago Cubs should have a persecution complex or pronounced emotional instability, regardless of whether it is justified. - Bits and pieces of good seasons are not substitutes for good seasons. Victor Diaz has parts of good seasons. It doesn't mean you run out and invest a lot of money in Victor Diaz. Assuming you can even view Milton Bradley as a right fielder, which is in itself dubious, start making a list of the right fielders in baseball better than him. It adds up to a lot. So great. In the end, he'll get hot for a few games against some team's #4 and #5 starters, not play enough games, and in the end we'll end up with a little less than the production we got from Jeromy Burnitz or the platoon mess of 2007 that yielded a .794 OPS. I think anyone who thought Bradley was going to be a substantial asset were probably in that same class of people who convinced themselves that by midseason 2007 Eric Byrnes was the missing piece to a Cubs World Series. To conclude, the major leagues are lousy with outfielders who don't play close to a full season but have a respectable career OPS. Now let's get out there and get Jonny Gomes. Milton Bradley goes on the same outfielder pile as Juan Rivera. Yeah, there may be a good player somewhere in Juan Rivera but you're stupid to commit any resources to find out.