Youre right. It does give us a better chance to win. The only reason why you would go with Pie and Murton over Jones and Floyd is defense and I think right now we can use every part of offense we can get. Since when are Jones and Floyd automatic offensive improvements over Murton? They are each still sub 800 OPS OF with checkered pasts (Jones usually isn't very good and Floyd usually can't stay healthy). Lets completely ignore Murtons sub 700 OPS though. I think he's talking beyond their small sample of ABs from this year. Three year splits: Floyd: 261/347/466 Murton: 303/370/462 Floyd's number have been trending down as he's getting old. Murton is on the rise. I still fail to see how Floyd is the sure-fire better option both long-term and short-term. I don't think Floyd is a good long term solution but the more I see of Murton, the more I'm not sure he's the long term solution either. I think Lou right now is handling it about as well as can be expected given what Hendry has given him. He's even planning on getting Ward some outfield time in smaller ball parks. That isn't going to help Murton gain any more playing time. It seems the baseball people with the Cubs have cooled on Murton a lot this year. I assume they have areason for that. Cubs baseball people have "good" reasons for all the silly/stupid things they do. Murton, long term, is going to be a great hitter. Not just a good hitter, a great hitter. A big part of me wants him to get his licks in now, to get comfortable with ML-caliber pitching, however, the other part wants this team to win, NOW, and the way Floyd's been producing lately it's hard to keep him out of the lineup when he's not injured. Hopefully Matt can put together a good string of AB's if he starts against the lefties this series. I really don't get where you are seeing this. Crystal ball. I dunno, it makes sense in my head, good-excellent patience at the plate plus the power he will have in a few years = great hitter? Why won't he be a great hitter?