Seems to me that Piniella thought about make a drastic change (moving Dempster to the rotation), considered the ramifications, took into account other opinions, then came to the rational conclusion that the best option was to leave Dempster as closer, put Guzman as set up man to improve performance in getting the game to the closer, and promote Marshall to the rotation. Despite all the hand wringing, it seems like a good decision making process. Except that if Marshall can't go many innings in his starts, we just sent out guy most capable of long relief other than Gooz to AAA. This is where DFA'ing Eyre would have made the most sense, cause we could still use Cotts in long relief and have Gooz set-up Dempster. What is with this DFA infatuation? People here always complain about Hendry selling low but is there any more extreme example of selling low than DFA'ing a veteran LH reliever that is coming off two solid years because of one bad month? Let Eyre work out his problems in long relief if you don't want him pitching in key situations, but giving him away for nothing makes no sense. This isn't the NFL where you don't have to pay his contract if you cut him. Selling low isn't the issue. I doubt there are any takers who would give us something worthwhile in exchange. It's not an infatuation with DFA, it's that Eyre is a waste of a roster spot, he hasn't been the same since last year's injury, though, he wasn't this bad in Sept. of last year and has looked *somewhat* better in his last couple of appearances, but that's not saying much.