Here is where you are off. When a group wants to bid for a club, said group must sign a release which states that they have no recourse if they are not chosen as the winning bidder for the ballclub...i.e., cannot sue. Tribune had to sign a similar agreement. BTW, yes, Kenney (the self proclaimed chairman) was the lead General Counsel and was involved in M&A with Tribune on the legal side of things. This saying, he was involved with the acquisition of Times Mirror Company which quite frankly began the downward spirla of the Tribune Company and why they are where they are today. Why on earth would the Tribune sign something limiting thier legal options? What possible benefit would they get from that? They signed it to get the right to purchase the Cubs in the first place. But that was a long time ago, and it still does not mean they can't and won't file a lawsuit. Gotcha. I'm not legal expert, but I presume that the Trib signing that, and then Zell buying the Trib makes Zell subject to the same agreement even though he wasn't the one that signed it in the first place?