i'm assuming this is in response to me. it's one thing to have success with or without great players. it's another for your entire resume to be based on an offense that is bruce arians's baby with tom brady quarterbacking (and, yes, an embarrassment of riches at WR). no idea what the hype is about or what makes people think he's interesting as a candidate other than arians talking him up. it doesn't necessarily have to be the case, but we already saw how much that means with reid/nagy (when reid took the blame for all the bad playcalling and gave him the credit for the good and said nagy was the most HC ready coach he's ever worked with blah blah blah). It wasn't really directed at anyone. It was part serious, part joking. All great coaches had great players which can make it hard to assess how good a coach really is, in my opinion. It feels like it is even more prominent in football. Maybe Belichick is one that can do more with less. But did he make Tom Brady great or would Brady have been the GOAT under someone else? No one really knows.