Jump to content
North Side Baseball

imb

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    31,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    112

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by imb

  1. Maybe if you followed the discussion, you would see that I'm not the one who posted "cherry-picked" statistics on Ruggiano this season. When someone posted about his trade value, I posted that if someone offered something decent that we ought to trade him before he turns into Nate Schierholtz (meaning he'll lose his trade value). His "advantage" this year (OBP) over Schierholtz last year will most likely disappear as the season wears on and he reverts closer to his norm (.318). lmao ok
  2. Sean Doolittle has a 48/1 K/BB ratio right now wtf
  3. yeah i like sports that have different rules.
  4. said bush did 9/11
  5. since he sucks at it and they drafted him as a lf, probably that he's not a catcher
  6. you've taken two comparable slash lines and indicated that counting stats (where one player played a full season and the other player less than a third) determines who the better player is. Maybe people would give you a break on that if you didn't act like an idiotic [expletive] in every other thread and in this one when it was pointed out.
  7. False. They're close, but false. Ruggiano: .247/.354/.395/.749 OPS+=104 with 2 HR and 8 RBI Schierholtz: .251/.301/.470/.770 OPS+ =107 with 21 HR and 68 RBI I'm not sure what obscure stats you're looking at, but Nate certainly had better numbers last year. hahahahahaha WOW Apparently that is your response when stats show you're wrong. ahahahaahaahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahahhahaahhahahahahhahahahahhahaahahahahahaahah
  8. False. They're close, but false. Ruggiano: .247/.354/.395/.749 OPS+=104 with 2 HR and 8 RBI Schierholtz: .251/.301/.470/.770 OPS+ =107 with 21 HR and 68 RBI I'm not sure what obscure stats you're looking at, but Nate certainly had better numbers last year. ahahhaahahhahahahahahaahaahhaahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahaahahhahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahhahahha
  9. I'd give him 5/100 without thinking twice
  10. The vuvuzelas were awesome in person. I'm committed to my every post in this thread being how I was at the finals last time. You know, in SA. san anotnio?
  11. (•_•) <) )╯ esp / \ \(•_•) ( (> añ / \ (•_•) <) )> lol / \
  12. I have Tseng at 9 and Paniagua at 24 right now, though Paniagua could skyrocket if this current trend keeps up another month. What's your current top 10? the iowa roster+scharwbs
  13. I literally can't believe this is the same castro that we saw last year.
  14. yeah as a complete novice france has been the most impressive outside of germany
  15. glad we didnt trade him for cargo
  16. Gonna see Iowa next month, gonna own
  17. Ill make sure and quote this to him when he's like 24 in december
  18. All college hitters in short season ball hit 5 HRs in their first 24 PAs. We would have been disappointed at anything less. it just reminds kyle that he didnt hit 6
  19. lol we can probably speculate i guess If we were playing Family Feud and the category was "things that give OMC a boner" and "beautiful women" was already taken, "dead Union soliders" would have been my next guess. I would quit the game. http://i.min.us/ilOAJq.gif
  20. jesus christ has he equaled his college HR total yet can he be flowbro4 or whwatever at this point
  21. lol we can probably speculate i guess
  22. If you are, you're not alone. so it's you and andy, ssr
×
×
  • Create New...