Quakers
-
Posts
1,526 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Quakers
-
If you read the update, Cordero has been placed on the DL, its just that CBS has not listed him as such yet. So I moved him to the DL. Beckett is officially on the dL, but is scheduled to start on Sunday. So I have activated him. We are locked in a close one. Both of us have two starts left. My final two starts as Beckett and Zambrano. Who are yours? When you compare our scores to the rest of the league we are not doing too bad. HBC has the top score at the monment with 224. Most teams are below 200. My problem has been Dunn and Zito.
-
Why are you complaining about Sexton :?
-
Marcum is dealing tonight. Chris, is that 5 or 6 starts for you? Luckily Tejada and Reynolds are keeping me even with you.
-
Minor League Discussion & Boxes 4-4-2008
Quakers replied to Outshined_One's topic in Cubs Minor League Talk
i agree. I am especially interested in Rhee. -
Arg...should have started Blackburn.
-
No I have used 4 starts too. Zambrano, Zito, Arroyo, and Jurrjens. Westbrook, Zambrano, and Beckett to come. Slowey, Buchholtz, Jurrjens, and Blackburn could be good.
-
No I have used 4 starts too. Zambrano, Zito, Arroyo, and Jurrjens. Westbrook, Zambrano, and Beckett to come.
-
Did I do something wrong? If so change it. Beckett is on the DL. So I had a bench spot available. Cordero is day-to-day. So I picked up Gregg and put him in the line-up as a RP. Cordero is not on the DL, but benched. Beckett should come off the DL on Sunday. At that point I will have to decide to dump Gregg or Cordero. That will depend on Cordero's health. I don't know the rule and of course since I'm matched against you it's worth bringing up. It's also as much for my future knowledge as the fact that we're matched up. I want to know too. Whenever I make a move that might be questioned, I post it so that I can get a ruling from our commish. But I would like to win and will take adavntage of every opportunity the law allows. Kind of like paying taxes. I want to pay my fair share, but why pay more than you have to.
-
Did I do something wrong? If so change it. Beckett is on the DL. So I had a bench spot available. Cordero is day-to-day. So I picked up Gregg and put him in the line-up as a RP. Cordero is not on the DL, but benched. Beckett should come off the DL on Sunday. At that point I will have to decide to dump Gregg or Cordero. That will depend on Cordero's health.
-
i thought that only applied to pitchers. it's my understanding that you would be able to pick up a FA to replace a day-to-day injured position player. So I see you changed the waiver issue already. So i picked up Gregg, Cordero is on my bench, and I have room since Beckett is currenty on the DL. sure, so long as you don't exceed the roster limits. and don't put the injured guy on your DL unless he's really on the DL.
-
Let's see if I remember the replacement policy. If I have a player who is Day-to-Day, I can bench him, but I cannot pick up a FA to replace him. It would have to be someone who stated the week as a reserve or in my minors. Right? The only way I can pick up a FA and placehim in the line up is due to a trade or someone being placed on the DL.
-
That's better. Sportsline makes it sound worse, talking about Lieber taking his turn in the rotation,etc...
-
CBS sportsline is telling me that Carlos left because of cramping in his hand. Is this true?
-
No. :D Well so far Zimmerman has a K .... not quite what I wanted :evil: Oh no....Cordero has shoulder stiffness :( WOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTT. Zimmy baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :thumbsup:
-
No. :D Well so far Zimmerman has a K .... not quite what I wanted :evil: Oh no....Cordero has shoulder stiffness :(
-
No. :D Well so far Zimmerman has a K .... not quite what I wanted :evil:
-
Former Tigers top pick retires
Quakers replied to Post Count Padder's topic in Cubs Minor League Talk
My guess is that KC is really glad that it picked lubanski rather than Harvey. :wink: -
Gibbons released by O's
Quakers replied to RynoRules's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
Or an example of why baseball needs a stricter drug testing policy. -
My guess is that right about now every Roadkill manager thinks that his team is the best and it is just a matter of a few weeks before the rest of the managers realize it. Therefore no one needs to make a trade. I am not sure why everyone else is so delusional :confused:
-
Finally, the seson starts for me tonight. Zimmerman and Cordero are with the Nationals. Both had a good spring, which I hope continues into the regular season. Two homeruns for Zimmerman and a save for Cordero please
-
I hope you lose. :D I hope you lose too :duel:
-
That's a little better, but still pretty lame. :roll: How about some talk about are injury situation. For me Beckett is the only player on the DL, but it is looking more and more like the just didn't want to risk having their star pitcher fly to Japan. Besides, it was only fitting that Dice-K start. Other than that my biggest headache is Votto. He has had a slow spring and with Dusty as the manager....Also, Dusty told Dunn to swing at everything so Dunn's average is currently around .190. Dusty could really screw me up this year :twisted:
-
Pretty quiet out there guys. Lets hear some chatter. [-X
-
One would think that hurdles would be his thing. He's crazy fast and can jump like that. Maybe the high jump? I don't know - maybe baseball just isn't his thing. Let's get a little perspective here. He has a Major League career, and he hasn't been the worst player either. He'll be arb eligible soon and will eventually make a couple of million dollars by the time he's in his early thirties. I think he "made it." Amen.
-
no, there will be no thread starting order as I think that is [expletive]. and no, you are not tied for first. :D Dang....... :cray: