The Bears were definitely the best team in the NFC but I think it was obvious that the Colts were the better team. For all the what-if the Bears have - what if Hester wouldnt have returned that kickoff, what if they the Colts hadnt allowed that long run by Jones, what if Vinatieri wouldnt have missed that FG, what if the Colts had done better finishing off their drives with TD's, what if the Colts didnt have 3 turnovers. The Colts definitely have what-ifs too. I'd say the Colts would win 2/3 match ups. -And what if Brown and Harris were healthy....Well what if Doss, Simon, Reagor, and Stokley were healthy? -I understand those kind of remarks because they're the same kind of things I say when I'm ticked about a game, but the truth is that the Colts are the better team. But the comments about Manning are kind of ridiculous: "I bet he's a horrible person because he's rich and he's good at football". Me and everyone I know (that would know anything) have only heard great things about him as a person. Just because now that he's won a superbowl he's going to go down as the greatest quarterback ever, doesn't mean you have to make personal attacks. Besides, Tom Brady is the only person who's a bad person because he's good at football. I wish the Colts could have beaten a team I dont like. The Bears are probably going to be good for a few years and if they arent playing the Colts I root for them, so good luck. And if you're looking for a quarterback, the Bears could probably get Sorgi if they're willing to give up Urlacher. And GO CUBS!!!