And therein lies the problem. Who trades good young/cheap players for other good young/cheap players? No one does. So unless the Cubs start hitting the lottery with guys at the AAA level who haven't broken through yet, that means they are giving up on several seasons while their returns from those deals toil Daytona and Tennessee. Put another way, you start trading off several guys from that Soto, Marmol, Marshall, etc. group, and you're giving up until 2014 or so, which is unacceptable, unnecessary, and most likely unwise. TT -- what was your take on the 2011 draft consisting of mostly high schoolers? I could be wrong, but my interpretation of that is "take the kid with the highest ceiling possible" with the expectations that none of them are major league ready for at least 3-4 years. To me, that sounds like an organization that is willing to build through free agency for the next few years until the system is ready to start supplying a ready-stream of talent to fill needs or to be used in trades to fill needs. The purely FA route hasn't worked thus far. If there are players on the roster (Soto, Marmol) that can help fill needs why not do it? Again, I don't know what the definition of "decent return" is, but I think it is foolish to at least consider it. Truthfully I don't understand why anyone would say any player on this team is untouchable with the notable exception of Castro.