Um, no. You don't trade your best player or let him walk so somebody else can move to his position. A) Yeah, Lee's our best player, and everybody in baseball knows how good he is. That's why his trade value would be enormous. B) Soriano is not just "somebody else". He's a guy who has about $115M left on his contract. So if a player is owed a lot of money, trade one of he proven anchors of your team to accomodate the expensive player. Yes, I know they'd likely get a decent return, but it seems ridiculous to shake up the team that much by getting rid of one of the core players to. I've yet to see you provide a projection or anything that shows Soriano would be significantly more likely to be more productive offensively or less of a liability defensively if he moved to 1st. This ultimately amounts to you trying to argue addition by subtraction...trading Lee would create a tremendous offenive hole. They're not likely to get an established player back unless it's a pitcher, and the can't afford to trade a proven player for prospects unless they somehow come across another established impact bat in the meantime. I wouldn't do it, but I think some of you are being a little harsh on frostwyrm. It's not unfathomable that trading Lee and moving Soriano to first couldn't improve the team. It would depend on what we got back for Lee, which would undoubtedly be alot. The difference is I wouldn't be influenced to do it because of Soriano's health, I'd do it because someone made me an offer for Lee that I couldn't refuse, and it included a better LF in return. I agree that it's not a hopeless idea...if it looked like the Cub could get someone (through signings or other trades) to help offset the loss of Lee, great. And maybe under new ownrship, that kind of proactive all around thinking will be part of the Cubs...but until then, I don't trust the Cubs for a second to try such an undertaking and not fail miserably.