Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    98,224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Sammy Sofa
    Am I missing something? Wouldn't this just be a minor league deal?
  2. Sammy Sofa
    Hopefully the Cubs can knock Moyer out in the 6th.
  3. Sammy Sofa
    Eh, I actually wouldn't mind seeing the Cubs doing either move. Getting rid of Zambrano's deal and then letting Lilly and Lee walk after this season would be huge. I don't think it would be too difficult to move Fukudome for the last year of his deal, too. That would put the Cubs in much better shape financially.
  4. Sammy Sofa
    So your response to a discussion about a baseball manager...is to bring up a basketball manager?
  5. Sammy Sofa
    Not necessarily. A healthy Nady is usually going to be a better option.
  6. Sammy Sofa
    More of a potential upside with Nady. With Dye you know he can't hit righties at all at this point. Nady potentially gives you someone off the bench who isn't as limited offensively. I suppose. But if we were looking to acquire a right-handed PH (which is all Nady is at this point) then we should have just brought someone up off the farm. The key is "at this point." There's still a very good chance that Nady ends up being a very valuable asset off the bench in the near future.
  7. Sammy Sofa
    More of a potential upside with Nady. With Dye you know he can't hit righties at all at this point. Nady potentially gives you someone off the bench who isn't as limited offensively.
  8. Sammy Sofa
    OK, what? At first I figured he wanted Baker in there for his numbers against the Phillies: .462 .483 .538 1.021 in 29 PA. But his numbers actually at Citizens Bank are horrible: .111 .100 .222 .322 in 10 PA. Whereas at CB Nady has hit: .280 .280 .480 .760 in 25 PA. And he also has good career numbers against lefties. I don't get it.
  9. Sammy Sofa
    Why?
  10. Sammy Sofa
    Cubs win 8-4.
  11. Sammy Sofa
    To be a real number 1 in a 30 team league, why must you be top 10? During the regular season it doesn't matter much. Would you want to enter the playoffs with your best starter not even among the 10 best in the league? Not if I have a better choice otherwise, but it's hardly an unwinnable situation to be in.
  12. Sammy Sofa
    To what, justify him starting for the Cubs?
  13. Sammy Sofa
    BRENLY NEEDS TO MANAGE THE TEAM.
  14. Sammy Sofa
    Nope. He still has a lot of adjusting to do at this level as well as simply growing into the player he'll be physically. Like jersey said, they key right now is his approach at the plate. I really don't think anyone expecting him to show up with much power this early was approaching his call-up realistically.
  15. Sammy Sofa
    Why not? It sure as hell wasn't ideal, but the Cubs were in the race for most of the season. I enjoyed it from the perspective that for most of the season I was following them with the idea that with just a bit of a push they might be able to sneak in. Obviously, that fall apart at the end, but I was truly invested in the team for that summer. I think I just enjoy baseball differently than you do. And why don't you just ask J.R. what he meant? You created this whole tangent off of a single post that doesn't express anything like what you keep acting like he did. You're basing this whole thing simply on the word "great" being typed.
  16. Sammy Sofa
    This whole argument is pointless. You're acting like there's some set way that people have to remember those seasons or have experienced them. The point, for me, is that I really enjoyed most of 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008 and even 2009 as they occurred. That's it. It's not a matter of me being "wrong" or "lying." I, and others like J.R., just have a different memory of those seasons than you. Compared to the other decades I experienced, the 80's and 90's, it was great in the sense that more often than not I was invested in watching a Cubs team that was managing to be competitive. If you want keep up this completely one sided argument where you think anyone is actually saying that the Cubs were truly great in the 00's, go right ahead. Nobody is actually saying that, yet you're showing zero sign of realizing that.
  17. Sammy Sofa
    And Silva is pi. Delicious, delicious pi.
  18. Sammy Sofa
    I'm really hoping we'll retain both coaches (Rothschild and Jaramillo) after the season. If a new GM/coach comes in, I hope they don't clean house because it's going to be tough improving on the current hitting and pitching coaches. I'd like them to hold onto Trammel, too, though I'm sure Sandberg will want/expect to have the bench coach to be someone who is "his guy."
  19. Sammy Sofa
    Actually it is: Do you need that repeated? That's what we're talking about: people are saying it's "great" in terms of enjoying the seasons as they happened. Yeah, the endings didn't work out, but compared to a decade like the 90's it was great when it came to just being to sit back and enjoy the Cubs playing good or at least competitive baseball throughout most of the regular season. I was able to do that for 5 seasons in the 00's. I was able to do that once in the 90's. In that regard, yes, the 00's were great. Does that mean they actually played great baseball? No. There's a clear difference, and you're being willfully obtuse by arguing a point that nobody is making. Nobody is saying the Cubs were actually playing great baseball or putting great teams on the field in the 00's. It was just "great" in terms of having that many seasons in a decade where the Cubs were in it when we'd never been able to experience that before.
  20. Sammy Sofa
    Explain how Dempster is overpaid.
  21. Sammy Sofa
    You may not realize you are lying, but you are. There were a handful of great seasons but the decade was not great. Just stop pretending it was. I'm not. Once more, the point is that it's "great" IN COMPARISON TO THE SUCKFEST THAT WAS THE 1990'S. How are you not grasping this at all?
  22. Sammy Sofa
    When my only other decades of personal reference are half of the 80's and the 90's, it's pretty clear I'm not "lying," you lunatic. Nobody is stopping you from being a misanthrope, gooney.
  23. Sammy Sofa
    YEAH, TAKE THAT, PIRATES, WHAT WITH YOUR 5 WORLD SERIES TO THE CUBS' 2!
  24. Sammy Sofa
    Are we still pretending that the Nationals are hopelessly terrible?
  25. Sammy Sofa
    They were great years. Maybe not great in terms of keeping Jim Hendry in a job, but definitely great in terms of J.R. enjoying the respective seasons. Exactly.
×
×
  • Create New...