Well, yeah, when you oversimplify things like that it makes him sound much better than he actually is. Vogelbach ideally projects to have significant value because he appears to be a much better hitter than Viciedo's flawed, one-dimensional output. Breaking it down to only saying "neither one is a good fielder" is effectively ignoring the really obvious differences in their offensive approach and makes it sound like they're similar players. They're not. Viciedo's value is basically only in his home runs. He effectively negates that value with how bad he is at basically everything else (both offensive and defensive). It's questionable whether or not he'd even be able to hack it as a DH, much less on a team where he'd actually have to play the field.