Helton deserves it. A quick glance at stats shows that much. If Lee gets it, it'll be more for his hitting than anything, as odd as that is for a fielding award. You got the stats to prove why Helton deserves over Lee? In BP today they have an article by Clay Davenport about the GG. Here's what he has say about the NL 1B:
On all of the tables below, the fielders will be rated by the familiar stat-stat-stat routine, only instead of AVG, OBP, and SLG, they will be Fielding Rate, Runs Above Replacement, and Runs Above Average (using the in-season, rather than the all-time, version). Since the awards are as much about reputation as performance, and since a reputation usually takes time to acquire, we’ll break the stats out into 2005 only, 2004 and 2005 combined, and career. Asterisks (*) will designate the 2004 winner.
.
.
.
National League
Player, Team 2005 2004-05 Career
*Todd Helton, Col 114-28-19 115-61-43 110-201-124
Nick Johnson, Was 109-20-11 107-28-14 105-38-16
Derrek Lee, Chi 109-24-14 109-50-29 107-138-70
Lyle Overbay, Mil 111-24-15 108-43-25 110-59-36
In the AL, I think Lee and Overbay could very easily be winners, but the competition is stiffer here thanks to Todd Helton. Helton is the defending champ, and makes a clean sweep of all three categories, even though Overbay and Lee have performed at legitimate GG levels--Helton’s just been better, and his career total is rapidly moving up the all-time lists. Voters could be swayed by Lee’s Triple Crown run in batting, and he did beat out Helton two years ago. Helton should win, but none of the four listed would be a disgrace to the award.
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4581 thanks