Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SpongeWorthy

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,759
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SpongeWorthy

  1. His TD:INT ratio is still a bit of a downer to me, but he's improved his completion percentage each year (47.3 to 53.8 to 57.2) and his rating has improved each year as well. His TD:INT this year is just 11:6, though, which is much better than two years ago (14:15). He has a prototypical NFL build with a strong arm and good mobility and I think some teams will fall in love with that. The scouts have to love that he plays in a pro style offense. Imagine if he were on Tennessee with actual weapons playing in the same system he is at UW, he'd be an unquestioned top prospect. The only reason he isn't a superstar is because of Willingham. Bad QB coaching combined with pretty dreadful talent around him. He really is the best athlete I've seen at QB whose throwing motion isn't all jacked up like VYs.
  2. If everybody else is covering it it's kind of strange for the world wide leader to not cover it. Well they don't have the excuse of Steve Phillips being a participant on Shaq Versus this time.
  3. Locker has really shot up. Is he really the top draft eligible quarterback though? Another year of coaching and separation from Willingham's poisonous influence could do him wonders.
  4. Grit & Heart is meph? I might have suspected that a few weeks ago but I never thought about it much. G&H is a lot less petulant, that's for sure.
  5. How did you glean that the SEC has a tougher non-conference OOC than those two conferences? I'd like to see those numbers. Does that include FCS opponents as well? Also, the SEC honks are usually the ones proclaiming that they're far and away the best conference so I think it would be incumbent on them to prove that their quarterbacks aren't total crap (which they are).
  6. easy there captain hyperbole, all he said was that it would be a coin flip and laid out his reasons why. If SEC don't have good QB's this year, they DEFINITELY have good defenses. It's amazing how nutty SEC fans are about keeping up appearances. If you can actually sit down and watch LSU, UGA, UT, Ole Miss, S. Carolina, etc. and tell me that isn't garbage quarterback play you're completely delusional. Those guys are awful.
  7. Iowa's a TD favorite over all of those teams except Arkansas maybe.
  8. I normally like to rag on the Big 10 but any SEC honk that is going on about conference superiority this year is fooling themselves. The quarterback play in the SEC is unbelievably god awful. No way that they're blowing most conferences out of the water when the QBs suck that much.
  9. http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/preview2009/news/story?page=Predictions0910-Bulls Most see the Bulls in the 5-7 range. Nothing surprising there. Jalen Rose is a fan.
  10. Jay Glazer is the NFL's version of the over caffinated liquer sales rep who annoys the piss out of people during happy hour.
  11. How is it a competitive advantage to tell the Vols they can't wear orange?
  12. That's from Shoot 'Em Up.
  13. Brady's 2007 was a historically great season. Anybody who expected him to repeat that is an idiot. He's also coming back from a knee injury and before the first game of this year, hadn't played in a real game (not preseason) since the Super Bowl loss to the Giants. The odds of him stepping back in and throwing for 300 yards and three TD's week in and week out right away were slim. Teams had already started to adjust to Brady in the 2007 season (e.g. the playoffs). It's not a knock on him it's just that teams learn how to defend things that terrorize the league. Now Orton is nowhere near the caliber of QB that Brady is but he'll fall from this level of performance. He's simply not that good a quarterback to maintain a 100+ passer rating. Remember when Grossman was lighting up the league in the first half of 2006? Orton has a much better cast around him now but he'll slip. So far the only game he's had to play catch up in was a miraculous fluke. His team simply hasn't given up points in the 2nd half of games this year and is denying an ungodly amount of 3rd down conversions. That stuff isn't sustainable. At some point Orton will have to perform coming from behind or will meet a team that can force him to attack downfield for an entire game. Denver could scrape by because of their D and running game but he's still not going to WIN the game for you in that situation. I guess my point is that Denver hasn't been in a situation where they absolutely had to be explosive in the passing game.
  14. Teams will adjust to Orton and what McDaniels is doing. It's not like Brady kept tearing up the league after his 2007 regular season (Titans aside). He has GREAT personnel around him but a team with a decent secondary can stack the box and will make Orton have to attack downfield to move the football and he'll struggle. I have zero doubt about that.
  15. Orton has time to cook steaks back there and they have a good receiver group and scheme. Teams will adjust and find ways to pressure him or make him beat you down the field. The Chargers don't have the personnel for it. He'll come back down to Earth. He's doing a great job now though. God I wish the Bears had Ryan Clady. He flat out embarrassed Merriman tonight.
  16. http://i37.tinypic.com/jp8owi.jpg
  17. Ryan Clady is making Shawne Merriman look like Tila Tequila.
  18. Denver's offensive line is amazing in pass protection. Merriman is completely worthless now.
  19. God Norv Turner is so dumb.
  20. Watching the Bulls/Magic preseason game that just started on NBATV. Noah has definitely bulked up in the upper body. Hopefully he turns into a defensive anchor down there.
  21. Are they really worth insulting? BC is a nonentity. Though their punk fan base would never accept that. I attended the BC game in 2004 that we lost by one and their fans were intolerable leaving the stadium. It's good that you clarify they lost that game by one since it's so hard to differentiate between all the losses without such details. I attended the game in 1993 when all the ND student section cried like a bunch of little girls and it was glorious. I believe that was a 2 point margin. Good memory, buddy. By the way, that win cost ND the national championship. If BC knew anything about being in the title picture in November I'd expect them to cry upon being removed from it too. 1993 was my introduction into how stupid college football is. Wasn't there some committee after the season to determine who should've been #1 between FSU and ND? I was 7 years old then and knew that the system for determining a national champion was freaking dumb. Sadly, it's not gotten much better. I believe that was the first time BC ever beat ND too.
  22. If Alabama is one dimensional (and that isn't even close, btw, Bama has 6 guys with over 130 yards and a TD, Bama has and forever will be a running team first) it is because McElroy seems to be forcing it abit. If McElroy goes back to spreading the field like he did earlier, Bama's offense will be fine. If Tenneess needs a big defensive play to win the game, then they are in trouble. Besides, Bama will stay away from Berry. I so expect Eric Berry to be a complete no factor in the game. Tennessee will keep the game competitive, and the game will be close, but ultimately Alabama's superior talent and depth (not to mention the superior coaching Bama has over Tennessee, excluding Monte Kiffin) will prevail like it has in every game this yr. I say Bama win the game something like 24-7. Alabama is one dimensional because Greg McElroy is god awful.
  23. I want to vomit looking at those pictures. Why the eff did you do that Devin?
  24. no, that's not even a little bit true They can compete with any team in the NFC in any game. that's sort of besides the point. putting up a fair fight is nice for moral victories or whatever, but the Bears really don't have "elite talent". who's even got a shot at the pro bowl, besides Briggs? they aren't outclassing teams and beating themselves like people are suggesting, the reality is they just have an inconsistent QB and merely a decent supporting cast. he's got to force the issue to compensate for the guys around him. Elite teams win the games they are supposed to. They don't say "well if we did this" or "we did some good things but we didn't do them with consistency". Every team in the NFL or at least the upper 2/3 of the league do things well at least from time to time, but the best teams do them with consistency and execute when they need to. The Bears did some good things tonight, but didn't execute when they needed to, and it's now the second loss that you can say that. This isn't baseball where you can say "oh well we'll do it right next time", there are 16 football games in a season, and you don't execute like the Bears did today when they needed to and its the difference between winning the division, or making the playoffs altogether. Elite teams also have coaches who aren't late getting the defensive signals in on critical 3rd downs.
  25. I've seen him on the field for maybe 10 minutes of total game time this year and basically have loved his play. It blows he can't stay healthy.
×
×
  • Create New...