The Braves tried an extremely interesting draft strategy this year. Now, they've got a ridiculous amount of depth in their system and this likely played into it somewhat. But still, its extremely interesting..... Forget the rankings of the players too. Forget the amounts each individual got actually for a second.....The Braves had a draft budget this year of 9,881,200. They spent 9,945,000 on THREE players. They gave Kyle Wright 7,000,000 at pick 5. Which is 1,292,700 over the slot of that pick. In the second round, they took OF Drew Waters and actually SAVED money at that spot somehow. Slot on that pick was 1,674,600. Waters received 1,500,000. So, a savings of 174,600 on the pick.(for a guy that I honestly figured would get 2M+) Then, in the 3rd, they take a HS RHP Freddie Tarnok(ranked 170 by BA, unranked by MLB) and give him 1,445,000. Slot is 709,000, so they went over by 736,000 on the pick..... The rankings, the perceived value, that's not the real story here. They took an unknown JC guy in the 4th and senior signs in 5-10. They've got 400,000 or so to sign their 4-10th round picks. I love this strategy. You're not likely to get major leaguers out of those rounds anyway. Putting all your money on just a few guys seems like a bad idea in some ways, but you've got rounds 11-40 to spend up to 125,000 on guys again..... In our case, let's assume we still took Little and Lange at 27 and 30. Still took Estrada too, since he's easily getting the 3rd highest bonus in our class.... I'd trade the rest of our class, Abbott, Thompson, Uelman, Velazquez, Thomas, Filiere, and the two senior signs for one of Enlow or Allen. So, would you rather spread it out, as we did, or sacrifice the depth for one extra top 30ish player? For me, I'd rather grab the potential impact guy. Obviously, the draft board has to set up, and this is clearly revisionist....But, I'd love to take this type of shot at some point over the next few years.