Are his constant injuries and his health good signs too? We don't HAVE to trade him. But that's not bad value(and it doesn't need to be a prospect, just that value equivalent) If we keep Dex, its not a horrible idea to look at the pitching he can net. If Candelario nets us the same, fine, look at moving him. But, looking at moving Soler isn't ridiculous at all. He's not very important to us, if we keep Dex. Even if he misses 80 games every year (like he did this year) he's still a surplus value for the next 4 years. You won't get that back in trade so yes it's stupid to trade him just because you can. That's why people who win the lottery go broke quickly. You're using .7 WAR as if its some sort of great gauge. Last year, he was at .1......Surplus value on these levels shouldn't even go into the equation. Especially when we have plenty of others who can likely provide that same surplus, in Almora, Candelario, Szczur, maybe Zagunis. You wouldn't be trading him just because you can either. You trade him IF you don't think he'll ever stay healthy, IF you think his defense cancels out a decent amount of his offense, and/or IF the pitcher you'd conceivably be getting in return, is someone you think is a contributor or future contributor. I have no clue what the FO sees at this point on him. If they still love him, he's obviously not likely to be moved at this stage of his value. If not though, grabbing what you can, while you can, is an option. I guess we'll see where they stand on him.