CUBBIEblue16

FOREARM strain, not elbow.

after talking to peavy's peeps, he'd like the west or midwest and prefers NL. my top 2 to get him: 1. cubs. 2. brewers.

This guy is an idiot, why does anyone care about what speed internet he has? He should die.

So like pretty much everyone on this board.

I think Kerry is one of those guys, no matter what happens that will always be in a Cubs uniform. He will forever be a Cub.

Theyre hurt?

Fat chance in hell they catch us now.

As far as high school goes, he was never that dominant. He pitched against my high school team and we roughed him up somewhat. He does throw hard though, walked a ton of guys and also hit a lot of batters.

Schlitter is from Chicago, Went to Maine South High school. I played little league with him. He was hitting low 80's as a 11 year old. I happened to be his catcher back in the day, I seemed to be the only 11 yr old able to.

Hi everybody, I was wondering if anyone had 2 extra tickets available for the sunday night Cubs Sox game. I can not seem to find anywhere at a decent prices. Please let me know if you do, thanks.

Care to elaborate? Yes, people on this board need to take the blue tinted sunglasses off and realize this deal is a steal for us. We getting one of the best leadoff men in baseball, an all-star and another great club house guy for pretty much nothing. You guys are blowing your loads over the 2 pitching prospects that have showed us NOTHING.

Cedeno's been to the majors more than once, and has been less than impressive each time. I'm not so concerned with giving him up. 2005 Ronny Cedeno says hello. :lol: I wouldn't have too much of a problem with him being included in this trade if the Cubs weren't also dealing away one solid starting pitcher and a pitching prospect who could have possibly been better than Marquis and Dempster this season. But theyre not, this board needs to realize this. Marshall and Gallagher in the rotation together at the same time, is in fact worse than Dempster and Marquis. Good lord at some of you people.

No. No it has not been the one glaring need. Leadoff hitter is not a position, it's just a spot in the order that any of the 8 position players can fill. This team's most glaring need for a very long time has been walks, and players who are both willing and capable of taking them. A little more generally, they've lacked OBP. And to the extent that a new hitter can significantly improve the OBP by replacing somebody who is already here, that player would have considerable value to the Cubs. You're right, a big need for this ball club is OBP, and you're dead wrong if you think one of the other 8 guys on the team can fill this role. I think you need to take a step back to a few years ago, year 2003..... We took off once we got Kenny Lofton, and all he did for us was get on base, steal bases and play solid defense. I believe Roberts is the same type of player, considering his OBP was .377 last year. He is what will spark this team, it also allows us to move Soriano down, where he needs to be. He is clearly not a leadoff hitter. I know now you're going to come back at me with DeRosa's OBP, which is also very good at .371. I guess, for the less of another argument here, we can say thats even. The one thing, which I dont understand why even is saying does not matter is stolen bases. The guy had freaking 50 last year, good lord! We havent had that many stolen bases since Pierre, and he didnt even get on base. Stolen bases are huge, that will lead to more runs, more runners in scoring position. Roberts would be a huge asset to this team. I am also very confident that DeRosa can still play SS, just as good, if not better than Theriot. DeRosa came up as a SS, and he still has a spectacular glove, his range worries me a little, but I believe lots of work in the offseason will make him a solid SS. This trade makes the Cubs an even more potent offensive team. I hate to say this, but ask them White Sox how they won their World Series. They won it with OBP, stolen bases, and timely hitting, and great pitching. Our pitching is strong and will only get stronger, Roberts is a player that will make us stronger offensively. With him, well score more runs, hell score a butt load of runs, and our 3-5 hitters will drive in significantly more runs. They won because of solid pitching and a crap load of home runs. Their team OBP was .322. That's not all that great. But, they always had a man in scoring position, meaning they always had someone on base, and then stole a base. The stolen base seems to be forgotten in this sport now. The stolen base is a key category that not every team can posses. This team would be a lot more successful with a player like Roberts getting on base, stealing, and the scoring on a hit. They didn't always have someone on base. See their OBP stat. The stolen base is largely "forgotten" because the game has evolved beyond it in many ways due to how much hitting power has increased. Guys that are fast enough to steal a bunch of bases are almost as likely to score from 1st as 2nd if they're getting on in front of mashers. How is your "steals = more gooder" argument not just a carbon copy of someone's argument for Pierre being on this team? Speed kills, and it also bothers opposing pitchers, and could cause them to make mistakes. I don't understand how anyone can justify that Roberts is not a good leadoff hitter and wont help this team. The fact that anyone says this is just insane.

No. No it has not been the one glaring need. Leadoff hitter is not a position, it's just a spot in the order that any of the 8 position players can fill. This team's most glaring need for a very long time has been walks, and players who are both willing and capable of taking them. A little more generally, they've lacked OBP. And to the extent that a new hitter can significantly improve the OBP by replacing somebody who is already here, that player would have considerable value to the Cubs. You're right, a big need for this ball club is OBP, and you're dead wrong if you think one of the other 8 guys on the team can fill this role. I think you need to take a step back to a few years ago, year 2003..... We took off once we got Kenny Lofton, and all he did for us was get on base, steal bases and play solid defense. I believe Roberts is the same type of player, considering his OBP was .377 last year. He is what will spark this team, it also allows us to move Soriano down, where he needs to be. He is clearly not a leadoff hitter. I know now you're going to come back at me with DeRosa's OBP, which is also very good at .371. I guess, for the less of another argument here, we can say thats even. The one thing, which I dont understand why even is saying does not matter is stolen bases. The guy had freaking 50 last year, good lord! We havent had that many stolen bases since Pierre, and he didnt even get on base. Stolen bases are huge, that will lead to more runs, more runners in scoring position. Roberts would be a huge asset to this team. I am also very confident that DeRosa can still play SS, just as good, if not better than Theriot. DeRosa came up as a SS, and he still has a spectacular glove, his range worries me a little, but I believe lots of work in the offseason will make him a solid SS. This trade makes the Cubs an even more potent offensive team. I hate to say this, but ask them White Sox how they won their World Series. They won it with OBP, stolen bases, and timely hitting, and great pitching. Our pitching is strong and will only get stronger, Roberts is a player that will make us stronger offensively. With him, well score more runs, hell score a butt load of runs, and our 3-5 hitters will drive in significantly more runs. They won because of solid pitching and a crap load of home runs. Their team OBP was .322. That's not all that great. But, they always had a man in scoring position, meaning they always had someone on base, and then stole a base. The stolen base seems to be forgotten in this sport now. The stolen base is a key category that not every team can posses. This team would be a lot more successful with a player like Roberts getting on base, stealing, and the scoring on a hit.

Wonder how much it would cost to get Pierre from LA on> He is not a prototypical lead-off hitter. For saying something so dumb and trying to insult me, why don't you show me your baseball smarts and tell me what a prototypical lead-off hitter is. Then compare it to Pierre. Too bad the only positive thing we can say about Pierre is he doesn't strike out. Other than that, he gets caught stealing way to much, and he sure as hell doesn't know how to get on base.

No. No it has not been the one glaring need. Leadoff hitter is not a position, it's just a spot in the order that any of the 8 position players can fill. This team's most glaring need for a very long time has been walks, and players who are both willing and capable of taking them. A little more generally, they've lacked OBP. And to the extent that a new hitter can significantly improve the OBP by replacing somebody who is already here, that player would have considerable value to the Cubs. You're right, a big need for this ball club is OBP, and you're dead wrong if you think one of the other 8 guys on the team can fill this role. I think you need to take a step back to a few years ago, year 2003..... We took off once we got Kenny Lofton, and all he did for us was get on base, steal bases and play solid defense. I believe Roberts is the same type of player, considering his OBP was .377 last year. He is what will spark this team, it also allows us to move Soriano down, where he needs to be. He is clearly not a leadoff hitter. I know now you're going to come back at me with DeRosa's OBP, which is also very good at .371. I guess, for the less of another argument here, we can say thats even. The one thing, which I dont understand is why everyone is saying stolen bases dont matter. The guy had freaking 50 last year, good lord! We havent had that many stolen bases since Pierre, and he didnt even get on base. Stolen bases are huge, that will lead to more runs, more runners in scoring position. Roberts would be a huge asset to this team. I am also very confident that DeRosa can still play SS, just as good, if not better than Theriot. DeRosa came up as a SS, and he still has a spectacular glove, his range worries me a little, but I believe lots of work in the offseason will make him a solid SS. This trade makes the Cubs an even more potent offensive team. I hate to say this, but ask them White Sox how they won their World Series. They won it with OBP, stolen bases, and timely hitting, and great pitching. Our pitching is strong and will only get stronger, Roberts is a player that will make us stronger offensively. With him, well score more runs, hell score a butt load of runs, and our 3-5 hitters will drive in significantly more runs.

How much of an upgrade over Mark DeRosa is Brian Roberts, though? And Roberts doesn't make our very bad back end of the rotation any better. And he certainly doesn't make our glaring hole at short go away. What has the cubs one glaring need been forever? Heres the answer..... a prototypical lead-off hitter, and it just so happens that Brian Roberts is one. He is an upgrade over DeRosa is every asset of playing 2B and hitting. I love DeRosa, and I want him on this team still more than anyone here, but we need to put our man crushes on him aside and think about winning a World Series, regardless what someone you people here think, he does in fact bring us closer to a World Series.

I got tickets to every series..... 4 in the bleachers for home game 1 4 in terrace reserve outfield home game 2 2 in the bullpen box home game 3(my god were these expensive)

St. Louis AB R H RBI BB K LOB Season Avg D. Eckstein ss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .301 S. Taguchi cf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .296 A. Pujols 1b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .319 J. Encarnacion rf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .285 S. Rolen 3b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .267 R. Ludwick lf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .249 Y. Molina c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .277 A. Reyes p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .091 B. Ryan 2b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chi Cubs AB R H RBI BB K LOB Season Avg R. Theriot ss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .290 J. Jones cf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .276 D. Lee 1b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .310 A. Ramirez 3b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .321 D. Ward rf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .306 M. DeRosa 2b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .293 M. Murton lf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .263 J. Kendall c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .299 S. Marshall p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .087 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sorry buddy

Are the lineups out yet?

I remember a few years ago when this board actually made sense. I agreed with a lot that was said here but was never a frequent poster. Can someone please tell me what has happened to all the people on this board that a year or 2 ago made any sense. Every person Jim is interested in, that is some what decent and will not be a starter very long and WILL BOLSTER THE BENCH, you guys hate. Stewart is what the Cubs need, not as their everyday lead off hitter but as their primary #2 hitter. He is significantly better than Floyd and at this point, I am just so disappointed with Floyd that I would rather see Podsednik out there than Floyd. Reading through these 5 pages or so, I have seen very few people accepting of Podesednik. Why? I'll tell you why, because everyone on this board thinks they know how to solve this teams problems when in fact they really dont. There are so many complainers on this damn board that just need to keep their mouths shut. NSBB is almost becoming an annoying place to talk about baseball. Acquiring Podsednik will not cost much, we all know that, so get that crap out of your heads. I would rather have Podsednik on my bench than Pagan. Regardless of what half you GM wannabes think, Podsednik will be a decent bench/spot starter to this team that has speed makes good contact, runs the bases smart and can play a little defense. This post, in no way, shape, or form is to say Podsednik is a good ball player atleast this year and if I had my way, my dream way we would have all studs on this team.

I dont think theres been a player out there that this board hasnt wanted.

Guthrie

Dumbest idea ever