Good thing he a) has the ability to improve and b) provides immense value elsewhere to offset his growing pains even with that slash line. Here's a visual that might be interesting. Against LHP this year Baez's wOBA + defense was roughly equivalent to having Ian Kinsler(a near 6 win player) in the lineup. Against RHP this year Baez's wOBA + defense was roughly equivalent to having Darwin Barney(a 1.5 win player) in the lineup. Could the Cubs deal with a slightly below average player at 2B against RHP to be a defensive specialist with the potential for more offensive production? Almost certainly. And I certainly expect Baez to get his share of at bats against RHP, if only because he's the primary backup at SS and 3B so any Russell/Bryant days off or any injury to Russell/Bryant/Zobrist means Javy in the lineup every day. The other side is that no one has keener insight into how likely Javy is to make the necessary improvements than the Cubs, and we also know that the Cubs place a ton of value in approach at the plate. To illustrate, only about 40% of MLB hitters have a BB% of 9+, but Baez(3.3%) and Almora(4.3%) were the only Cubs(min 100 PA) out of 15 to miss that mark. So unlike, say, Soler, even if Baez improves he's still not the archetype the Cubs are hoping for, so they might be more pessimistic(and therefore more likely to trade him or plan on him not improving) than us. I can't imagine a FO as smart as this one ignoring the strides he's made to conclude that he has more value to trade for some eventually-will-break pitcher. I would be personally really irritated that they'd trade such a dynamic, disruptive, exciting player with a ceiling that high. Without Javy we could easily be talking about how much it sucked to get bounced by the Giants. In short I hope they don't trade him.