Well, I've never argued that we should have signed Furcal. I've just argued that it's too early to call him a bust. If I were running the Cubs, I would have worried about RF and CF (in that order) before worrying about SS. But had we signed Furcal, and had we been in a position to contend, I wouldn't have been upset had we given him a contract similar to the one that LA gave him. He's locked up for what should be his prime years, and if he's a bust, LA won't be stuck with him for two more years like the Cubs would be with their 5 year offer. That said, overpaying for talent IS a good idea if that talent could push a contender over the top. In 2003 and 2004 (and maybe 2005) the Cubs were in a position to win and overpaying for top-level talent would have been justified. I don't think the 2006 team was in such a position in the offseason, so it didn't bother me much when LA upped the ante and he went elsewhere.