All of this begs the question: why were these schools named Choctaws, Utes, Seminoles, Illini in the first place? If not for tribute then what. I equate a tribute as being the same thing as naming them because they once lived in the area of the school. People seem to think "tribute" means it is some sort of glorified honoring of them. When I think of tribute as far as this is concerned I think of the regional distinctions. Choctaws lived in central Mississippi and this is where MC is located. The Seminoles lived in central and northern florida, this is where FSU is located, the Utes where in present day Utah. And as far as the argument about them having logos that are warlike. Well, generally speaking mascots are supposed to be fierce. Most schools with animals try and be fierce: panthers, cougars, bears, lions, etc. The Rebels, Minutemen, and Volunteers have their rifles, the Trojans and Spartans have their swords the Indian mascots have their tomahawks. At least that's how I see it. And I know what you all will say "this furthers the racial sterotypes that they were cruel, bla bla" Well, a school called the "Savages" certainly does that. But I don't think a Tomahawk Chop promotes a stereotype. Does the firing of Cannons at some schools such as the Vols and Rebels further the stereotype that the particular group represented are violent? I honestly don't think that a person will look at the Tomahawk chop and go "oh gosh! I better watch out for Indians, they might hit me with a tomahawk" and if they do, well then, they are just idiots. Disclaimer for Treebeard: Sorry if any of the words i've used in this diatribe have offended your sensibilities. I know that using the word "idiots" may offend actual idiots. Sorry.