Jump to content
Join us for a livestream as we discuss the red-hot Cubs, starting at 4pm Central time! ×
North Side Baseball

Chocolate Milk

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,507

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Chocolate Milk

  1. Chocolate Milk
    Tell that to the White Sox who won a WS on Pitching and Defense. Their team BA was .262 with a .322 OBP and yet they managed to win a WS. they hit a crapload of homers. True..but they had 200 HR to our 194. They had a .262 AVG with a .322 OPB while we had a .270 AVG with a .324 OBP. So what was the difference between the two teams offensively? The difference must be in the clutch hitting because defense means very, very, very little. Yeah, that or exceptional pitching. I'll go with the pitching myself. You don't think that the defense had anything to do with that? I don't think it had much to do with it, no. How's our good defense working out with our pitching this year?
  2. Chocolate Milk
    Nope. The only difference between the 2005 Cubs and the 2005 White Sox was defense.
  3. Chocolate Milk
    Tell that to the White Sox who won a WS on Pitching and Defense. Their team BA was .262 with a .322 OBP and yet they managed to win a WS. they hit a crapload of homers. True..but they had 200 HR to our 194. They had a .262 AVG with a .322 OPB while we had a .270 AVG with a .324 OBP. So what was the difference between the two teams offensively? The difference must be in the clutch hitting because defense means very, very, very little. Yeah, that or exceptional pitching. I'll go with the pitching myself.
  4. Chocolate Milk
    No one "hates" Izturis. We just think he sucks, because he does.
  5. Chocolate Milk
    This seems like a likely senario.
  6. Chocolate Milk
    There isn't anything to "neuter."
  7. Chocolate Milk
    I will also be at the game tonight. I am thinking about going with the Paper Bag look.
  8. Chocolate Milk
    The White Sox won with small ball and the Cubs will try to win with Little League ball. if by "small ball" you mean hitting a million home runs and having 5 healthy pitchers all year, then I agree Nevertheless, the ball is still pretty small. Smaller than a grapefruit, say.
  9. Chocolate Milk
    http://www.nfl-fans.com/style_emoticons/default/moe.gifhttp://www.nfl-fans.com/style_emoticons/default/moe.gifhttp://www.nfl-fans.com/style_emoticons/default/moe.gifhttp://www.nfl-fans.com/style_emoticons/default/moe.gifhttp://www.nfl-fans.com/style_emoticons/default/moe.gif
  10. Chocolate Milk
    he seriously did not say that. sure did. God help us.
  11. Chocolate Milk
  12. Chocolate Milk
    I'm going to pretend I didn't see this post. There's nothing to like about having someone on the same offensive level as Neifi playing every day. Not to mention he'll be getting paid more than Neifi to be Neifi for 2+ more years. So basically you would of just kept Maddux, and let him walk for nothing? Izturis was a solid player in 04. .288 Average .330OBP 4hr 62RBI 25SB, not to mention the guy is excellent with the glove. Izturis is far worse than nothing. I would have rather given Maddux away for a ziplock bag of air. :lol:
  13. Chocolate Milk
    http://forumimages.footballguys.com/style_emoticons/default/TrainWreck1.gif
  14. Chocolate Milk
    Truely terrible.
  15. Chocolate Milk
    WTFWEGTWEHTOQ!@$&!@&)TY!HO@ORG!F(^R*!@)E$*(!@#I
  16. Chocolate Milk
    LOZL!
  17. Chocolate Milk
    We'll miss ye, Todd. Someone should link the Treeman(?) post where Todd was the root of all the world's evils.
  18. Chocolate Milk
    We're getting pretty close to the deadline. Has there bee any other news on this front? Are we all just kind of waiting around?
  19. Chocolate Milk
    I think we have different definitions of this word. yeah, we must. for instance, i think a 1.17 whip and a 4.20 era is good. Yes and I consider an ERA+ of 97 to be below average. fine, he's horrendous and i wish he were dead. a 1.17 whip is good, and i didn't take the time to draft a thesis on the finer points of his statistics. i thought he'd be a decent 3/4 for the brewers (despite his woefully inadequate ERA+) given the fact that the brewers are a mid-market team. \You need to lighten up. I disagree that he's good, no need to get your panties all in a bunch. Take a deep breath. well, i guess it depends on how you view good. my point was that he's more than a mere inning eater, which is how someone described him. he's no, say, jered weaver, or anything. Fair enough.
  20. Chocolate Milk
    I think we have different definitions of this word. yeah, we must. for instance, i think a 1.17 whip and a 4.20 era is good. Yes and I consider an ERA+ of 97 to be below average. fine, he's horrendous and i wish he were dead. a 1.17 whip is good, and i didn't take the time to draft a thesis on the finer points of his statistics. i thought he'd be a decent 3/4 for the brewers (despite his woefully inadequate ERA+) given the fact that the brewers are a mid-market team. \You need to lighten up. I disagree that he's good, no need to get your panties all in a bunch. Take a deep breath.
  21. Chocolate Milk
    I think we have different definitions of this word. yeah, we must. for instance, i think a 1.17 whip and a 4.20 era is good. Yes and I consider an ERA+ of 97 to be below average.
  22. Chocolate Milk
    I think we have different definitions of this word.
  23. Chocolate Milk
    Gimme those sweet sweet prospects.
  24. Chocolate Milk
    No.
  25. Chocolate Milk
    ??? Grossman, Bradley, Berrian, Mike Brown, Benson, and Thomas Jones were all injured last year. The Bears had some signifigant injuries last year.
×
×
  • Create New...