Well, Remmy's base stats were a little better in '02 than '03. However, one of the big differences was his usage. Remlinger is significantly better against righties than lefties. He always has been because of his repotoire. In 2003, Remmy faced lefties 37% of the time. In '02, he only faced lefties 28% of the time. Given that lefties hit .263 off him, that increase wasn't a good thing. It drove me crazy last year every time I saw Baker lift Farnsworth (who destroys lefties) to bring in Remmy (who gets lit up by lefties) just to get the lefty-lefty matchup. But that's just me... Ironically the at-bat against Remlinger I remember the most last year was when he struck out Giambi in the June series at Wrigley... I've read these comments before and the criticism seems to be well-founded...I suppose the comparison really needs to be Remlinger against lefties versus all other available options on a given day versus lefties...key term being available on a given day. Was it Dusty pulling Farns for Remlinger because he didn't want him to face the lefty or because he had thrown 20-30 pitches and he was worried about usage (Remlinger the next best option)?? I'd have been interested to hear Dusty's response to this situation... Nothing to back this up but of all the relievers in the pen I get the sense that Farnsworth is most succeptible to wear and tear...I find myself wondering how often Farnsworth is "truly" available versus sitting in the pen with no conceivable shot at pitching in that game...this is exclusive of the obvious situations where he has pitched 2 days in a row or two out of three, etc.