Respectable to me is a very bad goal to set. Respectable reaks of mediocrity, and appreciating respectability is akin to accepting mediocrity. Even if they finish 82-80, what would be a strong finish, this season would be a disaster. You can't just judge a season based on how you play the last two months. Games in April, May and June count, even though the Cubs often downplay the risk of losing lots of them. A "respectable" finish to 2006 is only going to mean sustained mediocrity, which is going to keep this team locked into the cycle of mediocrity that has plagued them for so many years. First off, I never set "respectable" as a goal for the Cubs season. We all wanted different, I can't stand the way the team has played the majority of they year and once again will be disappointed come October. However, given the first half of the season and literally feeling like we wouldn't score a run the entire series; it is a welcome change since the Milwaukee series just before the AS break. Outside of the Nationals series and a few loses that we should have won, I enjoy seeing the Cubs win as of late. I am not sure how you can argue wanting the Cubs win and then spin your argument into accepting mediocrity. I agree with you. I understand the whole "Respectable should not be accepted", but it's nice to see the team battling everyday and winning on a regular basis. It certainly helps players like Murton, Pagan, Cedeno, Marshall, Marmol, Hill gain confidence, and hopefully they can continue to progress into next year. I'd rather see this, then the team just packing in the season.