You can when he's being compared to Arod. Pujols had an .008 advantage in OPS. ARod was the best defensive SS in the game, now is one of the better defensive 3B in the game. The difference between their defense is much greater than the difference in their offense. I think you're skewing things slightly by taking only last year's numbers. If you look at their careers, Pujols is easily the better offensive player. Pujols: .332/.416/.621 ARod: .307/.385/.577 ARod had an above average season last year and Pujols just had his ho-hum average season and still beat ARod by 8 OPS points. I'll take Pujols offensively. Pujols isn't such a great defensive liability that we should overlook age and the offensive gap between the two players. Yes, and if you look at their career postseason numbers you see a similar disparity: Pujols: .336/.428/.620 ARod: .305/.393/.534 And for all of ARod's vaunted running advantages, Pujols did hit more doubles and triples than him last season, had more runs scored, and a higher stolen base percentage. Also worth noting are Pujols' advantages in BB/SO ratio and #P/PA. Factor in age and contract status and it seems like a no-brainer to me. If Pujols played 3rd, like he did coming up, instead of 1st, this would be no contest.