Well given that he has a career .366 OBP and .804 OPS in the minors, I'd say yes, the do suggest that he projects as something more than a "decent back up infielder." Meanwhile Ronny's career numbers are considerably worse - not necessarily a fair comparison because Cedeno started out in the minors when he was 18 and has always been young for his level, but the fact remains that Fontenot exhibits better patience, and his ability to not swing at everything means he hasn't been exploited at the big league level like Ronny has. Do you think that his solid minor league stats have something to do with the fact that he repeated AAA twice and was old for his level by a couple years by the end of it? I'm not saying Fontenot's bad, and I wouldn't want to release him, but I don't think that he is cut out to be an everyday second baseman. There's no such thing as being "old for his level" at AAA. A bunch of guys playing there are in their 30s. And yes, he probably was having as much success as he had at Iowa this year because he was there for a third year in a row, but his first year at Iowa he had a line of .272/.377/.430. I don't know that he projects as an above-average second baseman, but he could be adequate, or at least a versatile backup. Meanwhile I have no confidence that Ronny Cedeno can be a decent starting shortstop.