Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Finessing Them: With More Genius Than Gas, Justin Steele Seeks the Cy Young


    Matt Trueblood

    In a world full of stuff monsters and velocity gone wild, the Cubs have found one of the most unlikely ace-caliber finesse pitchers in recent memory.

    Image courtesy of © David Banks-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    It's strange to think of Justin Steele as a pitcher dependent on deception and command. He's not as young as we tend to imagine, but he's sufficiently new on the scene to feel like a young arm. He hits 95 miles per hour, occasionally, and his cutter sits just south of 92 on average. His secondary weapon is a slider. For as long as there have been radar guns, guys who can throw 95 have been power pitchers, and the slider has been the breaking ball of choice for power pitchers.

    The game has changed, though--perhaps even more radically than we can conceptualize as we watch each season slowly unfold. Steele's heat, which is under 92 miles per hour 57.3 percent of the time, is as tepid (based on pure velocity) as that of Kyle Hendricks was a decade ago, when the young twirler was sitting right around 90 miles per hour.

    Average Fastball Velocity Among Pitchers Who Threw 200+ Fastballs, 2008-23, Selected Seasons

    Season 25th %ile FB Vel. 50th %ile FB Vel. 75th %ile FB Vel.
    100th %ile FB Vel.
    2008 89.6 91.3 93.1 98.2
    2013 90.7 92.4 94 100
    2018 91.3 93 94.7 100.5
    2023 92.5 94.1 95.7 101.7

    The proliferation of guys who throw triple-digit fastballs has been well-covered, but it's harder to notice that what was a healthily above-average fastball 10 years ago is now almost precisely the median one. Needing to hump up a bit to touch 93, which is Steele's situation, used to mark a pitcher as roughly average. Now, it makes them solidly below-average, and they need to do something else very well in order to be a useful pitcher.

    Obviously, Steele has now put the question of his utility well out of reach, and is closer to being the best pitcher in baseball than he is to being a fifth starter. That transformation has been extraordinary, particularly in light of his inability to overwhelm people with sheer stuff. Steele has come to grips with the fact that movement and command are the keys to his success, and as a result, he's remade himself on the fly.

    Little has really changed in Steele's game this year, from a macro perspective. He's slashed his walk rate, which is notable, but it's tempting to view that as merely an improvement, rather than the result of a conscious and substantial adjustment. He's still mostly throwing two pitches: a cutter (which some algorithms persist in calling a four-seam fastball, but which is very much a true cutter) and a slider. He's hitting the zone more with both of them than he has in the past, but again, one could fool oneself into seeing that as a factor of improved mechanics or repetition of his delivery.

    That's not it. Rather, Steele has made some major and multi-layered tweaks to the way he attacks hitters, including slightly reshaping that fastball. By embracing the cutting action of it (and giving up on the idea that it's a cut-ride four-seamer, taking the ride out of it in a steady progression), he's consistently hit the inner half of the plate (to right-handed batters) with the pitch more and more often--especially the upper part of the strike zone to that side.

    Doing that, alone, is valuable. It's hard to overstate how much hitters hate when a pitcher can locate anything hard to their glove side (inside to opposite-handed batters, away from same-handed ones) and above the belt. Jacob deGrom throws so hard that his fastball would be good no matter how it moved or where he put it, but the reason that he's unhittable (when he's healthy) is that he can command his heat to that portion of the strike zone. It's very tough for hitters to see and square up.

    Steele has taken it further than that, though. To see how, let's start by breaking down his approach into the one he uses against right-handed hitters, and the one he employs against lefties, and by comparing those approaches in 2022 with the same in 2023.

    Against righties, Steele spent 2022 trying to work from up and away (with that fastball, still acting more like a four-seamer then) to low and in (with the slider). 

    db22b9b3-51bf-4e40-b1d1-d8a445ca19d7.jpg

    In 2023, while he's become even more dependent on that fastball, he's allowed its natural cut to become its defining characteristig. He's inside more often, and the slider works in a more purely vertical contrast with the cutter.

    d5af2e88-c1e2-4a6f-8e78-372f96995773.jpg

    Notice that Steele hasn't missed above the zone or away from righties nearly as often this year, nor as badly. Naturally, he's missed more often inside against them, and down, but fewer of his misses have been with the fastball (or cutter, as we know it to really be), and those balls that miss in and down on righties have to pass through the hitting zone in the eyes of the hitter. For precisely that reason, he's getting more swings, and especially more chases, this year.

    Brooksbaseball-Chart (76).jpeg

    Against lefties, Steele can be a very different, somewhat more traditional pitcher. Instead of having to work fearlessly inside without the margin for error afforded by great velocity, he can live on the outer half. Last year, though, he was imprecise in his efforts to do so. He worked, in a mirrored version of that same way as to righties, from up and in to low and away, without much intentional variation.

    0da84e6d-b3ef-4158-8524-778cfb26f66c.jpg

    This year, he's been much more of an equal-opportunity visitor of the outer edge, working up and away with the cutter more comfortably, and inviting lefties to see that pitch out over the plate and chase it even off the edge.

    9904331c-931e-45e2-b8a7-8e3feba667a3.jpg

    The flattening out of his fastball into a true cutter, and his mental adjustment to use it that way in relationship to his slider (even if he prefers to still call it a four-seamer, at least in public), has made Steele much tougher to handle. because his mistakes are less likely than ever to be in hittable areas of the zone. Worse yet (for his overmatched opponents), Steele can so brilliantly locate when he gets into this mental groove that he does have access to the outer third of the plate against righties. He just doesn't go there until he has the batter thoroughly set up.

    Here's a heat map of where Steele has pitched to righties before the count reaches two strikes this year.

    09d990f8-e19e-445c-ace9-06822a9ba650.jpg

    Inside, inside, inside, is the drill. The two distinct loci of greatest frequency (the larger, redder one up high where he throws the cutter, and the smaller one down low where the sliders go) show how good his command is on that side of the plate.

    Now, look at where Steele gets his whiffs against righties.

    9f34be0b-cb44-4341-aefb-0b595024f567.jpg

    He just violates the cues a hitter uses to attack every other pitcher they see in a given week. He comes inside when they look away, and he goes away when they look inside. His ball has unusual movement, and he's worked to ensure that that movement is well-disguised. The ball comes out of his hand with fairly well-mirrored spin, and then seam-shifted wake effects steer the cutter into a deceptively flat arc and give the slider more sweep and less depth than would be expected. Their movement is, really, converging, but the effect so confounds the hitter that they might as well be diverging sharply. He actually releases his cutter a touch lower and a touch further toward first base than his slider. This is new, and the latter fact is decidedly not normal. Even if a hitter can spot a slight difference in his release point, therefore, they're likely to wind up baffled. 

    2ebff35f-2140-459e-8fb5-1f99dd87bc30.jpg

    Steele's command and control aren't as fine as those of Greg Maddux or Cliff Lee, for whom cutters were a way of overmatching hitters they could not overpower. His repertoire doesn't have the depth or the versatility of a pitcher like Roy Halladay, who could both sink and cut the fastball in addition to some nasty secondary stuff. Still, while he's operating at this high a level, Steele is that caliber of pitcher. With Monday's outing, he put himself at the front of any conversation about this year's NL Cy Young Award. That's a testament to his talent, his mentality, and the open-mindedness that allowed him to change from a strikeout maven with an upside curtailed by control problems into a strike thrower who knows how to get outs against all types of hitters, even late in games and under playoff pressure.

    Think you could write a story like this? North Side Baseball wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM NORTH SIDE BASEBALL
    — Latest Cubs coverage from our writers
    — Recent Cubs discussion in our forums
    — Follow NSBB via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a North Side Baseball Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

         When they pulled the tarp off this season and were getting ready to play ball, I knew this team was  going to be better than initially advertised. Even bet a bottle of whiskey along those lines with my cousin, who thought they would be improved, but not to the extremes I thought. To be fair, as a long-time Cub fan, I generally jump on board the latest bandwagon pretty easily. I have been way off mark in the past on a couple of occasions, not often, but it does happen. One of things I was excited about this spring was Justin Steele. Last year, and during the spring he was pretty impressive. I expected good things from him during the season, not to the level he has shown to date. I didn't even believe that he would even be in a "Cy Young" conversation, let alone be near the top in that conversation. I see a lot of Maddux like tendencies in him as well as some early Hendricks as well. True, he does not have a blazing fastball, but it is respectable. His ability to keep hitters off-balance and his ability to select pitches for the situation has been very impressive. I am not really sure how much is Justin and how much credit goes to the Cubs catchers, but regardless the proof is right there and undeniable, he dominates his starts. It gets to the point that when I see the pitching line-up for any game and see that Justin is starting. I have gone from "this will probably be a good game" to "we got this one in the bag." That feeling has been reserved for very few. Off the top of my head, that feeling came from guys like Jenkins, Reuschel, Maddux, Sutcliffe in 1984, early Jake Arietta, even early Kerry Wood got my heart pumping. These guys were all different type pitchers, some had real gas, and some had finesse and deception. To me, Justin Steele is the real deal. A big sign of confidence for a guy that pitches half his games at Wrigley. When the wind blows out........shoot! So, now we sit in the middle of playoff contention. Like I said, I thought we would be good, but maybe not this good. Early on, I had us slated for 87 wins. If we just play .500 ball the rest of the way, we should be right about that number. 90 wins is possible, but will take a winning streak. If the boys are ready for it, hell, so am I. I imagine if that were to happen, Justin Steele would be leading the charge. 🙂

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Billy62 said:

         When they pulled the tarp off this season and were getting ready to play ball, I knew this team was  going to be better than initially advertised. Even bet a bottle of whiskey along those lines with my cousin, who thought they would be improved, but not to the extremes I thought. To be fair, as a long-time Cub fan, I generally jump on board the latest bandwagon pretty easily. I have been way off mark in the past on a couple of occasions, not often, but it does happen. One of things I was excited about this spring was Justin Steele. Last year, and during the spring he was pretty impressive. I expected good things from him during the season, not to the level he has shown to date. I didn't even believe that he would even be in a "Cy Young" conversation, let alone be near the top in that conversation. I see a lot of Maddux like tendencies in him as well as some early Hendricks as well. True, he does not have a blazing fastball, but it is respectable. His ability to keep hitters off-balance and his ability to select pitches for the situation has been very impressive. I am not really sure how much is Justin and how much credit goes to the Cubs catchers, but regardless the proof is right there and undeniable, he dominates his starts. It gets to the point that when I see the pitching line-up for any game and see that Justin is starting. I have gone from "this will probably be a good game" to "we got this one in the bag." That feeling has been reserved for very few. Off the top of my head, that feeling came from guys like Jenkins, Reuschel, Maddux, Sutcliffe in 1984, early Jake Arietta, even early Kerry Wood got my heart pumping. These guys were all different type pitchers, some had real gas, and some had finesse and deception. To me, Justin Steele is the real deal. A big sign of confidence for a guy that pitches half his games at Wrigley. When the wind blows out........shoot! So, now we sit in the middle of playoff contention. Like I said, I thought we would be good, but maybe not this good. Early on, I had us slated for 87 wins. If we just play .500 ball the rest of the way, we should be right about that number. 90 wins is possible, but will take a winning streak. If the boys are ready for it, hell, so am I. I imagine if that were to happen, Justin Steele would be leading the charge. 🙂

    Going into the season I felt they were a low 80’s win team. Even bet the over 78.5 in Vegas. But being a PSD member before this site, listening to all the members bash this team as a low 70’s win team and anyone who thought otherwise was being fooled by the front office, I eventually just kept my opinion to myself. Good to see some positive posting. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/5/2023 at 1:06 PM, Rcal10 said:

    Going into the season I felt they were a low 80’s win team. Even bet the over 78.5 in Vegas. But being a PSD member before this site, listening to all the members bash this team as a low 70’s win team and anyone who thought otherwise was being fooled by the front office, I eventually just kept my opinion to myself. Good to see some positive posting. 

    I so get it Rcal! As a long-time Cub fan I have seen the rug get pulled out beneath my feet plenty of times. I hear the negativity sometimes, but it is ok to root for your team........after all are we not Cub fans!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/5/2023 at 2:06 PM, Rcal10 said:

    Going into the season I felt they were a low 80’s win team. Even bet the over 78.5 in Vegas. But being a PSD member before this site, listening to all the members bash this team as a low 70’s win team and anyone who thought otherwise was being fooled by the front office, I eventually just kept my opinion to myself. Good to see some positive posting. 

    Those detractors have made this season a bit more enjoyable. I love the fact that they were so right about a lot of things (Mancini, Hosmer, Taillon,) but we have basically gotten the 95% outcomes from others like Dansby and Bellinger, and then plenty of internal improvement to rise above and be a greater than the sum of the parts team. It's pretty clear that this FO deserves a lot of credit for believing in the roster they were building and sticking to their plan, and developing specific unique skills they identified to get contributions from all over the roster. The game-planning has definitely felt like 2015-2016 levels, pitching to Alonso and Robert notwithstanding, and the players deserve a lot of props for buying in and executing at such a high level.

     

    The general impressions of the team between NSBB and PSD were vastly different. On here most of the posters expected a team that would be slightly above 500 and with a couple fortunate breaks, could be buyers at the deadline and on PSD they were damn near locks to have another firesale and be back to square one in the winter. So many times we heard how they would be wasting the best seasons of Swanson's contract and that even the best case scenario from Bellinger wouldn't help the team much. 

     

    We'd be rich if we got a dollar for every time that argument was made. 

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...