Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Chicago Cubs 2024 Positional Previews: Catcher


    Matt Ostrowski

    As we hurdle toward Opening Day, today begins a series of pieces in which we'll preview the 2024 Chicago Cubs, position-by-position. Firstly, let's tackle the men behind the masks.

    Image courtesy of © Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    The 2023 season was a transitional year at the catcher position for the Chicago Cubs in so many ways. After penciling Willson Contreras in as the primary starter at the position for the previous seven seasons, the team was finally forced to go in a different direction, emphasizing things like defense, framing, game-calling, and the ability to work with pitchers over the offensive production that someone like Contreras offers. Not only were they moving on from a franchise icon who helped them win a World Series, but the shape of the production from that position was also going to look very different.

    While Conteras initially had some road bumps in adjusting to catching the pitchers with his new team, the St. Louis Cardinals, he still produced from a raw numbers standpoint. As a catcher, the former Cub had a 139 wRC+ and produced 2.5 WAR in just 90 games at the position, according to FanGraphs. Cubs catchers for the whole season produced an 82 wRC+ and 1.4 WAR. Where does that leave the North Siders behind the plate for 2024?

    The Starter: Yan Gomes
    2023 Stats: 116 G, 419 PA, .267/.315/.408, 10 HR, 5.0% BB%, 19.3% K%, 1.0 fWAR, 1.7 bWAR, 0.8 WARP
    2024 Projections: ZiPS: 96 G, 347 PA, .250/.297/.388, 9 HR, 4.9% BB%, 20.2% K%, 1.0 fWAR
    Scouting Report: If it felt like Gomes had roughly a million big hits for the Cubs last year, well, it’s because he did. Per FanGraphs, the Cubs’ catcher hit .462 in high-leverage situations. That was third in all of baseball. He hit .287 in medium-leverage situations, and .215 in low-leverage spots. If clutch hitting were a skill, this would be a very impressive bit of sequencing on Gomes’s part, though I am inclined to believe this is simply a funny bit of small sample size theater. 

    Regardless, it all counts, and when you put his performance in high-, medium-, and low-leverage situations into a blender, it came out to a roughly league-average batting line. Before last season, had you asked any Cubs fan or executive, if they would take a league-average line from Gomes in 2023, they likely would have signed up in a heartbeat. Where Gomes (unfortunately) took a step back was in those defensive skills, which the Cubs seemed to be emphasizing.

    In 2022, Gomes was a net neutral in framing, as he was worth exactly zero framing runs, according to FanGraphs. In 2023, however, he dropped all the way to -8.2 framing runs, one of the worst figures in baseball. That took him from being worth 8.0 Defensive Runs Above Average in 2022 to just 0.8 in 2023. 

    Now, there are a ton of other little factors at play when evaluating the defense of a catcher, a lot of which still aren’t quantifiable. Cubs pitchers still all have nothing but tremendous things to say about Gomes and how much they like to work with him, and when you compare that to the Cardinals throwing Contreras under the bus just a month into the season, it’s easier to feel good about the change. With all of that being said, how Gomes rates as a pitch framer is certainly something to watch for in 2024.

    Other options: This is where the Cubs can, hopefully, take a big step forward this year. With Gomes no longer under contract after this season, it’s time to get a good look at Miguel Amaya, to see if he can take over the full-time role in 2025. The rookie hit .284/.395/.433 in his first 82 plate appearances last year, but finished the year on a down note, slashing .141/.257/.281 in his last 74 plate appearances.

    It’s important to note that in 2020, Amaya was a highly regarded prospect, with FanGraphs rating him third in the Cubs system and 65th in all of baseball. In the three seasons that followed, the former top prospect amassed just 304 professional plate appearances due to the pandemic and injury, all of which significantly dulled his shine. Now, with a full professional season and some time with the big league club under his belt, hopefully Amaya can recapture some of that potential this coming season. 

    The Cubs have no other catchers on an already cramped 40-man roster, so I would be shocked to see them break camp with more than just Gomes and Amaya on the team. They have Jorge Alfaro, Pablo Aliendo, Joe Hudson, and Bryce Windham in Arizona as non-roster invitees, and will probably be able to stash at least one of those four at Iowa for depth. 

    The Big Question: This, to me, is actually two big questions: can Gomes rebound defensively? His 2023 season is probably the best we can expect from his bat at this point. If Gomes can find some value with the glove again, his ability to produce at the plate becomes much less important. 

    Will the Cubs be comfortable handing Miguel Amaya the keys? Gomes will be 37 this season, and as previously mentioned, is a free agent next offseason. Amaya should have plenty of runway to show what he can do this year. If he acclimates well and produces something like league-average offense and above-average defense, the Cubs should be comfortable handing him the full-time job going forward. If Amaya performs poorly, catcher becomes a huge question mark for this organization again, even as a couple more catcher prospects follow in his wake.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Kevin Alcántara

    Iowa Cubs - AAA, OF
    Alcantara hit his International League-leading 12th home run on Sunday. He has homered in three straight games and in four of the five games he played this week.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    CubinNY

    Posted

    Gomes had a really good year at the plate last year. More rest and maybe he can approach those numbers again. 

    LBiittner

    Posted

    I realize it's way too early, but I'm curious.

    Which catchers are projected to be free agents after this season?

    LBiittner

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    Thanks for the link.

    Oh my Gawd, what a yucky list of blah.

    Hint to young parents with children. Perhaps raise and develop a child to handle behind the plate duties. There is definitely a chance of employment there.

    If nothing else, teach them to be a lefty reliever

    squally1313

    Posted

    Alternatively, give Miguel Amaya 100+ games and do whatever you can to try to keep catching open for Ballesteros.

    LBiittner

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, squally1313 said:

    Alternatively, give Miguel Amaya 100+ games and do whatever you can to try to keep catching open for Ballesteros.

    I've understood Ballesteros has a potential to be batter.

    Is he well regarded as a catcher, or is he a Contreras?

    squally1313

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, LBiittner said:

    I've understood Ballesteros has a potential to be batter.

    Is he well regarded as a catcher, or is he a Contreras?

    This is from the FG scouting report back in late July:

    Quote

    It’s possible that Ballesteros will become an Alejandro Kirk sequel, with power at the forefront of his offensive profile rather than premium feel for contact. Ballesteros is a husky young catcher with an incomplete defensive skill set. He’s a good enough receiver to catch but anything that requires mobility is lacking, especially the consistency of his throwing mechanics to second base. Still, he’s too young to declare him a DH-only prospect. Ballesteros’ ceiling is sizable if he can stay behind the plate, and the Cubs should give him as long as possible to polish his ball-blocking and his throwing.

     

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, LBiittner said:

    I've understood Ballesteros has a potential to be batter.

    Is he well regarded as a catcher, or is he a Contreras?

    He's more of a Schwarber at this point, though there is time to improve and prove doubters wrong.

    CubinNY

    Posted

    Has anyone seen him this spring? Did he drop any weight?

    LBiittner

    Posted

    Sounds like a work in progress that will possibly take a few more years to develop catching skills. (Our own shiny & new Hector Villenuva) (( for you old timers))

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    There were a few tweets this offseason suggesting Ballesteros was making progress behind the plate. Perhaps Counsell can bring some of the Brewer magic with him, too. He obviously wasn't the catching guru, but I can't imagine he wasn't in the room or deaf the entire time, either. 

    It's optimistic to think Ballesteros catches in the MLB, but not so optimistic I'm counting it out yet. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    I've mentioned this before, but I'm generally convinced by the idea that the soft factors in catcher defense add up.  We've had several years of strong, competitive, and/or rich teams punting on measurable catcher production and instead installing a pitcher whisperer behind the plate.  I don't love appeal to authority, but the Yankees, Rays, Astros, and Dodgers among others all doing something over that span feels pretty compelling.

    So this may be cheating but I view Gomes as a plus defensively.  And while he's old and coupled with being a catcher his offense can fall off a cliff at a moment's notice, he's been and projects to continue to be roughly average offensively (by the lowly standards of the position).  Then you have Amaya who on paper looks like an above average catcher on both sides of the ball, and also gets some buzz for being a budding pitcher whisperer.

    Like would I rather have Will Smith or Adley Rutchsman?  Hell yeah.  Am I worried about the position?  Not a ton.  There's actually a bit of a relief in not having too much of the team's projected production tied up into a position with such a brutal attrition rate.

    • Like 2
    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    I've mentioned this before, but I'm generally convinced by the idea that the soft factors in catcher defense add up.  We've had several years of strong, competitive, and/or rich teams punting on measurable catcher production and instead installing a pitcher whisperer behind the plate.  I don't love appeal to authority, but the Yankees, Rays, Astros, and Dodgers among others all doing something over that span feels pretty compelling.

    So this may be cheating but I view Gomes as a plus defensively.  And while he's old and coupled with being a catcher his offense can fall off a cliff at a moment's notice, he's been and projects to continue to be roughly average offensively (by the lowly standards of the position).  Then you have Amaya who on paper looks like an above average catcher on both sides of the ball, and also gets some buzz for being a budding pitcher whisperer.

    Like would I rather have Will Smith or Adley Rutchsman?  Hell yeah.  Am I worried about the position?  Not a ton.  There's actually a bit of a relief in not having too much of the team's projected production tied up into a position with such a brutal attrition rate.

    I'm with you, and that's what makes it such an important season for Amaya and which side of the starter/backup divide he might fall on.  If he looks like a good defensive(including all aspects) catcher and can merely be a Gomesian 90-100 wRC+ guy, then it takes a lot of pressure off.  You can pick up a Jacob Stallings or keep Gomes on a lesser deal even if his bat falls apart because you know you've got up to 100-110 games spoken for.  If Amaya doesn't look Gomesian on one or both sides of the ball, then things get more complicated and you start pushing your luck with the position(or at least more than you did in '23-24).

    • Like 2
    LBiittner

    Posted

    From this day forward, I pronounce we use the term gomesian when comparing future catching candidates. I love it. And I doubt it'll ever leave this head. 

    Thanks T.T.

    LBiittner

    Posted

    One quickie, I've noticed the ever present ear pieces on catchers now. Who on the cub bench is the designated pitch caller?

    mul21

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, LBiittner said:

    One quickie, I've noticed the ever present ear pieces on catchers now. Who on the cub bench is the designated pitch caller?

    The catcher )or in Hendricks case, the pitcher) are still calling pitches using PitchCom.  It's not coming from the bench.

    LBiittner

    Posted (edited)

    26 minutes ago, mul21 said:

    The catcher )or in Hendricks case, the pitcher) are still calling pitches using PitchCom.  It's not coming from the bench.

    Interesting. I thought it might have been a bench coach. 

    When Contreras was catching he took direct signals from the bench, when he was a cub

    I'm sooo behind the times. I just now figured out, thanks to you, Hendricks was touching his waistband yesterday and calling the pitches. I'm such a Dinosaur!!!

    Edited by LBiittner
    We Got The Whole 9

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    I've mentioned this before, but I'm generally convinced by the idea that the soft factors in catcher defense add up.  We've had several years of strong, competitive, and/or rich teams punting on measurable catcher production and instead installing a pitcher whisperer behind the plate.  I don't love appeal to authority, but the Yankees, Rays, Astros, and Dodgers among others all doing something over that span feels pretty compelling.

    So this may be cheating but I view Gomes as a plus defensively.  And while he's old and coupled with being a catcher his offense can fall off a cliff at a moment's notice, he's been and projects to continue to be roughly average offensively (by the lowly standards of the position).  Then you have Amaya who on paper looks like an above average catcher on both sides of the ball, and also gets some buzz for being a budding pitcher whisperer.

    Like would I rather have Will Smith or Adley Rutchsman?  Hell yeah.  Am I worried about the position?  Not a ton.  There's actually a bit of a relief in not having too much of the team's projected production tied up into a position with such a brutal attrition rate.

    Yeah players that excel at both are so rare and burn out fast. I wish we had gone after Murphy though. But the Cubs highly value a guy that can communicate and lead a staff. They probably just hope they can get league average offense out of that situation. 



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...