Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs Draft Coverage

    2026 Chicago Cubs MLB Draft Day 1 Thread

    The first four rounds of the draft are Saturday, with the Cubs holding five picks. Follow along and give your thoughts on who Chicago selects and how you see them fitting into the system.

    Steve Drumwright
    Image courtesy of MLB.com

    Cubs Video

    While still jockeying for a spot in the postseason, the Chicago Cubs’ front office turns its attention to the amateur level this weekend for the MLB Draft. While none of the players selected this weekend are likely to impact the postseason push, the Cubs do recognize that they need to shore up the pitching in their system.

    Last year, the Cubs went with Wake Forest outfielder Ethan Conrad with the 17th overall pick. In 2024, they selected Florida State third baseman Cam Smith with the 14th pick, then traded him that December to the Houston Astros in the Kyle Tucker blockbuster. Right-hander Cade Horton was the last pitcher taken by the Cubs in the first round, picking him out of Oklahoma in 2022.

    The draft begins with the first four rounds Saturday, then finishing Sunday with Rounds 5 through 20. TV coverage begins at noon CT on NBC and Peacock, with it switching to MLB.com, MLB Network, MLB.tv and MLB+ at 1:30 p.m. Sunday’s telecast begins at 10:30 a.m. CT on MLB.com, MLB.tv and MLB+.

    The Cubs have the 23rd pick in the first round, with five picks total on the first day. The extra pick comes courtesy of Tucker signing with the Los Angeles Dodgers after receiving a qualifying offer, giving the Cubs the final pick of the second round at No. 75. The Cubs’ pool this year is $9,644,100. While there are slot values assigned to each pick in the first 10 rounds, teams can sign players for any amount as long as it fits into their pool. Deals are often made with certain players in order to redistribute money to another player. Teams can spend up to 5% more than their draft pool without incurring a penalty. The Cubs are one of three teams to surpass their bonus pool each of the 14 years under this system (the Los Angeles Dodgers and San Francisco Giants are the others). No team has ever spent more than 5% while this rule has been in place. Last year, 20 of 30 teams surpassed their bonus pool.

    Here are the slot values for each of the Cubs' picks:

    • First round (23rd pick): $3,947,600
    • Second round (62nd): $1,487,200
    • Second round (comp., 75th): $1,120,900
    • Third round (98th): $800,000
    • Fourth round (126th): $609,200
    • Fifth round (159th): $441,300
    • Sixth round (188th): $344,400
    • Seventh round (217th): $272,000
    • Eighth round (247th): $224,100
    • Ninth round (277th): $204,100
    • 10th round (307th): $193,300

    Players drafted in the 11th through 20th rounds do not technically have a slot value, although they are soft-capped at $150,000 without counting toward the bonus pool. Any amount above $150,000 will go against the cap. That amount also applies to undrafted free agents. Teams have until July 27 at 4 p.m. CT to sign their draft picks.

    Who should the Cubs take with their top pick?


    Check out our 2026 MLB Draft tracker, with scouting reports, player information, total pool allotments, and much more!

    View The 2026 Draft Tracker

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    James Triantos

    Chicago Cubs - MLB, IF
    The former 2nd-round pick is heading to the big leagues. In 88 games in Iowa this year, he was hitting .306/.344/.440 (.784) with 24 doubles, 7 homers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    Just now, Jason Ross said:

    Hey. It's Jasa. 

    I kind of like this pick. Rework the fastball and you've got something pretty good.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

    Probably $1m to get some of the prep arms who are "interesting but aren't top-recruits". They can likely find this amount. You probably go with a cold weather kid who is under recruited. 

    Ok, cool. Maybe they will do that then. Wasn’t sure what kids got in college. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Tryptamine said:

    I kind of like this pick. Rework the fastball and you've got something pretty good.

    I love this pick. RHP who can hit high 90's and has more in him. He looks like Cam Schlitter (he isn't Cam Schlitter). Big upside. And has floor as a nasty reliever.

    Bertz

    Posted

    tumblr_inline_p9stubvsEm1ss1lam_500.gifv

    Jasa & Jace Beck

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Rcal10 said:

    Ok, cool. Maybe they will do that then. Wasn’t sure what kids got in college. 

    Some of them get good paydays. But especially cold weather kids aren't getting big SEC NIL deals. You won't be buying out a Vandy recruit with $1m. But a Seton Hall recruit who will transfer to an SEC school before his junior year? You can buy them out.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    Just now, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

    Giant dude who can't throw strikes? Is this Dakota Mekkes?

    The fastball is the issue, the breaking stuff is not. He's kind of perfect for what the Cub pitch lab is good at fixing.

    • Like 1
    NorthsideAvenger

    Posted (edited)

    Neat trivia that Caden Sorrell grandfather, Billy was on the same rookie card as Ferguson Jenkins

    Edited by NorthsideAvenger
    • Like 1
    • Love 1
    Tryptamine

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

    I love this pick. RHP who can hit high 90's and has more in him. He looks like Cam Schlitter (he isn't Cam Schlitter). Big upside. And has floor as a nasty reliever.

    Think he goes under slot? I wouldn't imagine he's a big under slot, but maybe 100-150K under on the 800K slot?

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Tryptamine said:

    The fastball is the issue, the breaking stuff is not. He's kind of perfect for what the Cub pitch lab is good at fixing.

    And there's a positive: he basically didn't throw it. And he's coming to an organization that loves the fastball. If you can get him a feel for it a bit more, it should clean up control issues.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Tryptamine said:

    Think he goes under slot? I wouldn't imagine he's a big under slot, but maybe 100-150K under on the 800K slot?

    I doubt it. Zumach had him at $1.2m or so in his mock. I'd assume he comes in at, if not a bit over (maybe the small savings with Townsend goes to Jasa for neutral spending?)

    PackLandVA

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

    Giant dude who can't throw strikes? Is this Dakota Mekkes?

    Miz retro draft??

    Outshined_One

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    Ok, cool. Maybe they will do that then. Wasn’t sure what kids got in college. 

    NIL is more likely to go towards transfers than freshmen, too. Even if you're a Top 50 recruit, you likely won't be a starter on Day 1 on campus.

    It's a consideration, but more a "money now on MLB or money later in college and MLB" thing.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    Unless they're going mostly senior signs the rest of the way, not sure they're going to be able to pop and other big names. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

    Unless they're going mostly senior signs the rest of the way, not sure they're going to be able to pop and other big names. 

    Yeah, I'd expect that it's going to be a lot of college lottery tickets who are pitchers and then a fun 11th round guy from here on out. 

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    Good lord they went real deep dive on that pick. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

    He was committed to transfer to Alabama. Interesting

    Miami, LSU and Alabama were all in on his recruitment. Big program. He's 6'3". looks like he's rail thin; 165lbs was his most recent listing. Hits high 80's but not hard to think with 30lbs he can be 92-94.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

    dear lord, let this boy eat

    One listing I found on him had him at 6'2" and 145lbs. There's not a lot on his stuff outside of a few things of high 80's. But I like it. He's a fun developmental dart throw.

    • Like 1
    Tryptamine

    Posted

    So I'm not in love with day 1, but I think it was pretty good. There's no one I was super high on, but there was no one I looked at and was just like, why? Interesting that they completely changed up their philosophy compared to last year.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

    So I'm not in love with day 1, but I think it was pretty good. There's no one I was super high on, but there was no one I looked at and was just like, why? Interesting that they completely changed up their philosophy compared to last year.

    I'm a weird way, these are my favorite drafts: the ones where I'm not over the moon with anything but every pick has upside. The ones where you'd fall in love with player X usually ends up a bummer when they inevitably flop.

    This year feels like 4 solid lottery tickets, all of whom have pretty significant upside, and some real flaws with them. They drafted a talent in every spot, but one who requires development. Enough that I'm sure they got something with someone, just not sure if it's Jada or Sorrell or Townsend or Bailey. Nor do I think I care which one it is. 

    JD94

    Posted

    I think I really like what they’ve done. Townsend looks like your prototypical power starting pitcher. Sorrell is a big time all around player with top end SEC results. Bailey’s power is prolific. I saw the Schwarber comps, and yeah sign me up for that kind of power. Jasa is such a fun arm to get in the lab and see what you can unlock. 
     

    All 4 have question marks for one thing or another, but all 4 also have very fun upside. I’m kind of cool with how day 1 played out even if I personally preferred Rabe to Townsend. I still really like Cade. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...