Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • entries
    37
  • comments
    41
  • views
    34,132

Revisiting my Batting Order Plan: Am I Beating Counsell?


Cubs Video

Hello Cubs world,

those who follow me know that I made projections for the idea batting order (as tough as that is). Remember, i asserted with caveats that a manger will always make small adjustments based on ballpark, who's pitching, how the guys are feelings, and so on. 

Even still, the statistics converge on a "good general idea" - and its a plan closer to my own than theirs.    
Although they have been shifting things around very actively, a few things are dominant. Let's take a look at his most favored starting order vs RHP so far, The first four have been fairly consistent, and the last two. 

            

1 Hoerner - nearly every game

2 Bregman - sometimes Busch/Ballesteros 

3 Suzuki - most games since healthy

4 Happ - nearly every game 


5 Busch - unstable

6 Kelly - unstable

7 Ballesteros - unstable

8 PCA - nearly every game

9 Swanson - nearly every game

 

MY STANDARDIZED ORDER

Now let's look at the player stats vs RHP through the first 42 games. and compare it to my own preferred order. Note: several of these hitters excel versus lefties: Bregman (.392 OBP). Kelly, Shaw, and Swanson, in particular, are much better going that way. 

RISP is the only stat listed against BOTH handed pitching, due to the small sample size.  

If I underlined the stat, it means it hit the sweet spot for the batting order I suggested. 

If I bolded the stat, the player is in the top 3 on the team. 

I didn't bother scoring Amaya, as he is merely the backup catcher right now. 

                     OBP  AVG  OPS  RISP SB

1 Happ          .375   ,241  ,810 .156  2

2 Busch        .338 .244 .735  .326  1

3 Hoerner    .355  ,276  ,768 ,261  8

4 Suzuki       .391   .274  .890 .114  0

5 Bregman  .309 .246  .678 .267  2    

6 PCA            ,315  ,236  ,712  ,302 10

7 Ballesteros .321  .242 .704 .240 0

8 Kelly          ,344  ,235  .702 .263 0 

9 Swanson   .294  .203 .635 .195  3

BENCH BATS

Conforto      ,452   ,326  1,126 .222 0

Shaw            .302  .219   .668 .192 2

 

Analysis: How close am I? Let's doublecheck! 

Well, its hard to say, but I'd argue my lineup is closer to coherent than theirs.

#1 looks CORRECT> Happ's terrible RISP but elite OBP and OPS is a classic sign of a leadoff hitter.

#2: Suzuki fits here instead of Busch. His team WORST RISP despite a team BEST OBP. fits better. 

#3 Hoerner makes perfect sense at #3 because all his numbers align with your rally extender guy - especially adding the fact he almost never strikes out and can advance the runners with guaranteed contact. His lower OBP and higher RISP means yes, i was correct, Happ is a better leadoff guy. 

#4 With Busch's elite RISP, hitting in the #4 hole makes a lot of sense.

#5 Bregman still feels right because of his solid RISP - his other stats should recover after a bad slump. 

#6 PCA is spot on. He can act as a second leadoff style player mid-order, move around the bases, and also come through as a situational hitter with an elite RISP, despite low batting average. 

#7 Ballesteros can be moved back, and Kelly up, if for no other reason than the lefty/righty thing.  

#8 Kelly acts as a second cleanup hitter in the 7 spot- he's been more consistent than most. Solid RISP and power helps one slot higher. 

#9 Swanson is correct here - he has flashes of brilliance, is great with sac hits, and runs the bases well, but the low average holds him back. 

Verdict:  Here's my revised order (faith in Busch and Bregman heating up):

This order is nearly perfect in OBP, AVG, OPS, RISP sorting! Of course, it may revert to my earlier suggestion by midseason - and I kinda expect it to do that. But for now, this order fits their stats most closely: 

Happ          .375   ,241  ,810 .156  2

Suzuki        .391   .274  .890 .114  0

Hoerner     .355  ,276  ,768 ,261  8

Busch         .338 .244 .735  .326  1

Bregman   .309 .246  .678 .267  2 

PCA            ,315  ,236  ,712  ,302 10

Kelly           ,344  ,235  .702 .263 0

Ballesteros .321  .242 .704 .240 0

Swanson   .294  .203 .635 .195  3

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Banks-Williams

Posted

Nice to see Counsel giving some players a rest and mixing up the line-up.  Great move Craig!  Rested players perform much better.  Don’t want to do another ‘69 Durocher. 

Banks-Williams

Posted

You want PCA or Hoerner or Shaw as lead off men.  If they get on base, they can steal second, and advance to third on a single or a fly ball   Or they may score on the single from one of the three next batters.  The steal also eliminates the opportunity to get doubled up on a grounder.  You can also put them in the #2 spot for that reason. But then they’re on first with one out already.  You don’t want a slow player as lead or #2 since they can get doubled up.  Use these three players as #1 and #2 while mixing it up to keep them rested. 

Banks-Williams

Posted (edited)

They need to play Shaw more often.  He’s an excellent fielder, has great speed, and was hitting very good in April and into May. He should be playing at least every other game. 
 

If Shaw did an Amaya/Ohtani swing without the leg kick he’d be hitting above 275.  It is his upper body movement that is holding him back. It makes him have bad contact too often.  It creates a whole ‘nother variable, which is completely unnecessary.

Edited by Banks-Williams
Banks-Williams

Posted

Swanson is being paid big bucks, but he hits 189. Now he just struck out with bases loaded. His leg kick is ruining his hitting. Again, the upper body movement is creating another unnecessary variable.  Why do such when you already have to deal with ball speed, break, and location.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...