I'm surprised there is so much push-back to the three-batter minimum. First, the thing it's aimed at: Repeated breaks at key moments. 8th innings where you get inning break/one-out-guy/break/opposite-handed OOG/break/closer for the third out/inning break are miserable at what should be one of the most exciting parts of the game. Second, it should lead to more offense, which is always good. Third, I think it's gonna add some interesting strategic nuance to reliever usage and lineup-setting. Knowing that you're giving the offense an advantage in choosing PHers once you've committed versus leaving in the reliever who is already clear of the limit for one more batter. I mean, if it sucks it sucks, but I don't see the problem at first glance outside of the old "new rules are always bad" baseball reaction.