Jump to content
North Side Baseball

vance_the_cubs_fan

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    35,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by vance_the_cubs_fan

  1. Pie singles off the leg of James. Soriano scores. 1-0.
  2. Because it's on Turner South or whatever the network is called now.
  3. What makes you think we would take him if he did? It's a shame Samardzija didn't like football more, maybe we could have put the money he got into this draft. That wouldn't have happened. The money would have been a problem this year with the impending sale whether the team went above slot with several guys last year or not. Oh I know. I am just really pissed that we have to be a value team this year when we had a chance to get an elite college catcher, and then a couple first round talents slip to us and we have to take another slot money pick. Just one of several things to remember for all the people that thought an ownership change would definitely lead to bigger and better things. The change might. It's clear the in-between time is not good.
  4. Wow...we blow the wad on a POS like Samardzija and then have to pass on better talents like Burgess and Harvey. God, this sucks.
  5. More on Donaldson... Great. He can't really hit and he's not great behind the plate, but wait.... Well, great. We drafted the David Eckstein of catchers.
  6. With Burgess and Harvey on the board, we take a scrub like Donaldson. Read this... So with potential high ceiling guys like Harvey and Burgess, we take a guy who might make a good "back-up" catcher. WTF is up with the Cubs! :evil:
  7. Holy crap...both Burgess and Harvey still on the board.
  8. Has anyone taken Harvey? I don't recall seeing his name called.
  9. Could we get Burgess? Would we take him if he's there?
  10. Plz let Burgess slide to 48. What's the cause of his slide? Signability? Other issues?
  11. Correct. So it would be our pick at the top of the third.
  12. It would be a nice pick. Three guys at 48 that could be interesting: Doolittle, Burgess, and Brackman.
  13. Porcello likely a Yankee. I can't see anyone else grabbing him.
  14. BOOM Good call. So, do you agree the Rangers will take a chance on Porcello with their pick if he's still there?
  15. Burgess wouldn't be bad at 48. Will Doolittle still be there? Doolittle or Burgess? Who would you take?
×
×
  • Create New...