Cubs, these last couple of years, have been like the attractive girlfriend(s) (or boyfriend(s)) of your past, who are often characterized as "high maintenance. " They are seemingly always in some crisis or drama, yet you remain trapped in being attracted to them. MLB is ruled by money, which is the underlying structure of modern society, and yet we try to find a leisurely escape from that constant grind in our daily lives. My friends and family, across three generations of Cubs fans, look at it like an extended television mini-series or, as my wife describes it, as one of the permanent streaming programs on the Food or History Channels. I describe it in another generation as a summer soap opera. But I also look at seasons when they come to the final 20 or games like a business executive/investor and math head (I still teach night school mathematics and today mourn the murder of a fellow math teacher in Georgia), as numbers rule.
The Cubs this year and last are a collection of good players who are difference makers—also-rans. When you look at the composite talent difference between division leaders this year and last to the Cubs, it is stark, especially with the money invested to field the marque club at the major league level. Last year, they were 1.5 games out of the division lead and twelve games over .500. Today, at game 140, they are four games over .500 and 4.5 games out of the final wild card spot with the hot NY Mets between them and Atlanta. Any critical-thinking executive worth his salt would identify this as a decline, not an advancement. Penny-wise and dollar-foolish have been the Cubs' underlying management since 2019.
The Cubs straddled with injury after injury is not just a coincidence or bad luck. It is exacerbated by their approach to preparation, player development, and lack of talent (depth). As a former competitive athlete in forlorn youth now dating four decades ago, most of us knew that injuries were caused by fatigue and pushing oneself behind the limit of a capability more so than the random consequence of playing the game. This year's soap opera opening game in Texas saw the ace starting pitcher go down at the onset, trying to make a play where he was not physically ready to compete coming out of spring training; hamstring injuries don't happen, unlike broken fingers of batters. Over the last couple of years, the Cubs have had a deviation of soft tissue injuries beyond what competitive clubs have. Why?
But beyond that, the Cubs have to change their strategic management approach and stop simply fielding payroll like a medium-market team. In terms of financial value, they are valued among the top five baseball teams. Still, they are unwilling to compete with New York, LA, Philadelphia, Houston, Texas, or Boston regarding difference-making talent.
Sure, they appear to have a strong minor league prospect stable, but in reality, tell me who is a true difference maker instead of a good player replacement. Juan Soto is a 26-year-old free agent. At ten years, he will command Ohtani-level money. He is not Heyward; he is a future Hall of Famer. So now you have strategic decisions for us, the paying audience. (if they don't compete with the big kahunas, maybe I won't watch and attend the soap opera anymore). This would mean removing Happ from LF and club (or moving him to RF). The other move is to recognize that PCA is a future All-Star and to lock him up well beyond arbitration and the first couple of years of free agency. He is an OF anchor and is emerging as an offensive star. That leaves us on the infield. Paredes is a stopgap. Is the answer at 3B Shaw, it is a risk but it appears he can ascend. Hoerner is a fan favorite but not on a championship team. If Bellinger stays, he moves to first base, allowing Busch to go to his natural position at second base, and now offensively, the Cubs have some firepower, much of it left-handed. All this will cost money, which does not include being cheap with the bullpen.