Yep. Even the really smart, well-informed people in Cubs Twitterland become a bit of an echo chamber. This season, it seems like that group, broadly speaking, has been a bit blind to the structural shortcomings of this roster.
It might be interesting to compare a potential Steele trade to that of Q in ‘17.In fairness, that trade was made as part of an explicit rebuild but some of the same conditions hold. You had a very solid , if not great(don’t @ me) asset,several years of cost control, and a counterparty that * desperately* needed the asset.
Id submit that Steele likley can’t be expected to be this good going forward for a number of reasons that Matt laid out. Furthermore, the cost control dynamic really opens things up to some clubs , with limited checkbooks, that are desperate to make some serious playoff noise( TB, BAL, TEX, et al)….