I'm sorry... I just think your assessment that Molina is a "huge" downgrade offensively is in accurate. Fine, you want to suggest that OPS (essentially) is the most important stat for a player in the 7 or 8 hole? Okay. Let's look at the past two seasons and see how each player did, respectively in that spot... Molina: 2005: 1.136 OPS in the 7 hole, .867 in the 8 hole 2004: .723 OPS in the 7 hole, .782 in the 8 hole. Barrett: 2005: .498 in the 7 hole, .727 in the 8 hole. 2004: .916 in the 7 hole, .802 in the 8 hole. How is Barrett a significant upgrade? He isn't, in my opinion. Now, let's consider situational OPS. We'll take Molina's last 3 years and average them, and we'll only take Barrett's last two, since 3 seasons ago he was in Montreal. You suggested that Barrett is a better offensive player now than then, so we'll take Montreal out of the equation. Let's look at OPS W/RISP and OPS W/RISP & 2 outs... or "clutch" situations... Molina: .875 OPS W/RISP .936 OPS W/RISP & 2 outs Barrett: .843 OPS W/RISP .743 OPS W/RISP & 2 outs In those situations, Molina IS significantly better than Barrett. Now, I realize that I have taken a somewhat subjective look at those numbers, and that Molina looks much better than Barrett. I don't believe that he is. I just don't believe that Barrett is "significantly" better offensively than Molina. ANd, once again, when you throw in the defensive side of the postion (which is more important a measure for a catcher, imo) I'd take Molina. I like Barrett, but I'd take Molina, Lowe and Drew over Barrett, Williams, and Jacque Jones. is there a reason why we decided it was a good idea to use horrible stats here?